@jablocanas @bullsfan769 The issue with that is that MS had a huge game then and Sony didn't, yet they still sold more. Titanfall is the only "system seller" either console has right now, and it still wasn't enough to push them above Sony.
This is directed towards those people who are saying that this (or any GS review) was bought off by "X" developers:
I'd like an honest answer here, why wouldn't, if GS IS selling reviews, the developers behind ESO (who already spent an astronomical amount of money on the game) spend the money to buy a better review from GS themselves? Seriously, I want an answer here. That has always bothered me.
@BurningUp99 @sblazed @izini I can't wait for Wildstar to either get a good review or a bad review so that you can say that ESO bought off the review for Wildstar...
@BurningUp99 @memenotu @trueepower44 So your response to the critisism that ESO has mundane quests is to justify it because MMO's in general have bad quests?
@BurningUp99 Your still defending the game with nothing more than "if you don't like you, that means you just can't afford it."? I, for one, can afford $15 a month, but, IMO, the game isn't worth it in the current state. I'm level 40 in the REAL game and it is one of the most mediocre stories/worlds I've seen for quite a while. Combat and character customization are the only two good things it has and fails in every other respect imo.
You are way too bothered by a "fair" rating, way to insulting to others who disagree, not to be a blind fanboy.
Not at all interested. D3 vanilla left a very bad impression with me, so even though I see ROS as a step in the right direction, D3 is still tainted by the AH/AO issues.
I'd rather they just make D4, go back to their roots of what made Diablo so amazing, and forget about D3 already.
---Cipher---'s comments