-Mad_Rhetoric-'s forum posts
http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/943/943801p1.html
"I played cooperatively with a representative from Capcom. I controlled Redfield, moving him with the analog stick around the boat, taking aim in 360 degrees and unloading my bullets at whoever blocked my view. The inventory screen is accessed in real-time in the game world -- just toggle it on and off with the Y button. In the latest demo, I could select from weapons including the traditional handgun, the shotgun and the submachine gun, and revive my health with trademark sprays and plants alike. There are four control schemes to choose from including those that harken back to Resident Evil games of old and also those that have more in common with modern shooters like Gears of War. And although Capcom's latest is wholeheartedly beautiful in every regard, whether you're visually dissecting the detailed character models, the enormity of the world or the host of graphic effects that give it life, and yet the fluidity never strays from 60 frames."
--------------------------
Geow 2 and KZ2 never go above 30 fps, gears has very noticable frame rate issues, some times dipping to 15 - 25 fps, KZ2 on the otherhand runs at a smooth 30 fps.
RE5 runs at 60 fps which:
1. make the animations better, since you see twice the animation
2. lets you react faster
3. runs ultra smooth
4. more life like
5. is a must for all fat paced game (like COD, SSBB, NG, DM)
In all honesty with the pictures posted SO4 looks better graphics wise, don't get me wrong kz2 looks good but those SO4 pics look a lot more crispjasonheymanI agreed, though I will be picking up both
TC I know what you mean, while im not denying its graphics king, it just makes me wonder if anyone can do this if all you needed was ridiculous specsSure it's the best looking thing out there but how much of that is developer brilliance and how much is just pure hardware bruteforce?
Something else I'd like to mention, Crysis screenshots. Pretty much all the shots you see of Crysis are running on pretty high end kit and usually with no reference to frame rate. Is this a good representation of the PC platform's graphical capabilities on th whole considering the average hardware configuration?
speedsix
EGM was the best gaming publication and nothing can match them
Game informer is garbage, and gamepro ijust plain sucks
[QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"]uncharted didn't even get a 10 for graphics on ign, not even 9.5 but a 9.0 like 40 other gamesGodofBigMacsO noez? gears 1 got a 10
Log in to comment