That developers on the wii dont have to concentrate on graphics,physics and all the technical stuff and they can just concentrate on the gameplay.Whereas on the 360 and ps3 reviewers will snub a game with review points if it dares to look at bit dated or last gen.:roll:
And obviously a bad game with good graphics and physics is worth nothing so basically on the 360 and ps3 games need to look good and play good in order to be a great game.Developers have to devote resources to it and also learn new ways to tap the power of the technology in the consoles.Whereas for the wii devs are working with 5 year ols tech that they been used to and know it's potential.
Ya how fair system wars that we compare the wii with the 360 and ps3 on an equal ground.:roll:
The PS3 has games, but when I go the store and see their wall, it's really lackluster compared to the 360 right now. I realize that the PS3 has a few big titles on the way, but they've been on the way for a long time now.
[QUOTE="aka_aj03"][QUOTE="shoeman12"]it really is sad. it's been out nearly a year and a half and it still doesn't have a AAAE on gamespot or on gamerankings.Dilrod
Well by the end of this year you will be looking forward for a PS3.
That's what they said last year.
And yet it sold more systems than the 360 in 2007.
That's great, the PS3 still doesn't have a decent library.
Log in to comment