-wii60-'s forum posts

Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
wow that looks sad and crappy.
Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
Gears stills looks better (specially in the texture department,something that mgs4 lacks)and everyone knows that gamepro are sony fanboys.
Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
no games have complete destructable enviroments. maybe except rts.p2rus


Crysis has so many destructable enviroments., Gears 2 seens to be getting fully destructable enviroments,(not fully maybe),Killzone 2.(but the only destructable object i saw was columns and anything else..)and Red Faction 3,Far Cry 2,Alone in the Dark.. just to name a few..
Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
[QUOTE="-wii60-"][QUOTE="Mordred19"][QUOTE="-wii60-"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

[QUOTE="-wii60-"]So this is how it really looks? those textures are really ugly..

Mordred19

you are probably the one who wants this game most. lol

the textures are fine in this game. could be better, yes.

it's the jaggies that trouble me most...



It has good aliasing..but the shadows looks really crappy and then cable lines look so horrible..

is that all that you care about? or do you appreciate any of the non-graphical assests, like the non-linear enviorment, or the soldiers reactions to the battlefield conditions?



No,i just don't find any MGS game fun, but thats my opinion, but MGS used to be a game with very very good graphics.. not saying that MGS4 looks bad, but i should look way better..

what obligates it to look better, if the system hardware puts equal focus on graphics, physics, AI, and enviorment size? this is not shallow eye-candy that seeks to please with only shiny textures. the character models are very good, the framerate consistant, the animations are high quality, etc. think about the fact that the game is can render several squads of indipendent AI soldiers, at the same time as as a group of mechs that can tear apart parts of the enviorment?



Thats only in some parts of the game,better would be if u can actually do it yourself all the time.
Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
[QUOTE="-wii60-"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

[QUOTE="-wii60-"][QUOTE="cobragt4"]backgrounds arent 2dRikusaki



yes they are, u can tell that easy.it looks static and death.

170 people disagree with you.



still 2d and i don't care.


Stil over 170 people disagree with you and I care.

lol if you love gran turismo (and i can see you obviously don't)

then gran turismo will say, "i love you back".

gran turismo will show its love throuh its amazing car models, photorealistic backgrounds and realistic engine sounds.

no other game can do that.



Ofcourse they are.. its only a static digital photo.
Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
[QUOTE="-wii60-"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

[QUOTE="-wii60-"]So this is how it really looks? those textures are really ugly..

Mordred19

you are probably the one who wants this game most. lol

the textures are fine in this game. could be better, yes.

it's the jaggies that trouble me most...



It has good aliasing..but the shadows looks really crappy and then cable lines look so horrible..

is that all that you care about? or do you appreciate any of the non-graphical assests, like the non-linear enviorment, or the soldiers reactions to the battlefield conditions?



No,i just don't find any MGS game fun, but thats my opinion, but MGS used to be a game with very very good graphics.. not saying that MGS4 looks bad, but i should look way better..
Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts

[QUOTE="-wii60-"]So this is how it really looks? those textures are really ugly..

Always-Honest

you are probably the one who wants this game most. lol

the textures are fine in this game. could be better, yes.

it's the jaggies that trouble me most...



It has good aliasing..but the shadows looks really crappy and then cable lines look so horrible..
Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
So this is how it really looks? those textures are really ugly..


Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts

[QUOTE="-wii60-"][QUOTE="cobragt4"]backgrounds arent 2dRikusaki



yes they are, u can tell that easy.it looks static and death.

170 people disagree with you.



still 2d and i don't care.
Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts

[QUOTE="-wii60-"]That isn't gameplay..it looks better than the real MGS4 gameplay videos.tonythestudent

It is, just with a different skin :lol: Damage control



Damage control? that is a video and it looks way better than other gameplay videos of MGS4,but blind fanboys like you won't admit it,the real MGS4 doesn't look near as good as that video.