Not really, I dont call games undisputed graphics king, you can keep the assumptions up though. And no Eurogamer never called it the best. DF didnt either.[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="ToScA-"] However, reviews by Eurogamer, Gamesradar, CVG, Joystiq, IGN, destructoid and heck, even DF DO, whilst other are clearly vowed by the game's visuals, giving more credibility to the sites that laud the game as the best looking on consoles. Had the same review sites said the same thing about UC3 I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a thread created by you yourself calling UC3 the undisputed graphics king :lol:ToScA-
DF so did. They referred to it as cutting edge, in other words it has set a benchmark for other games to live up to, as opposed to Killzone 3 at the moment. cutting edge
2. The position of greatest advancement or importance; the forefront: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cutting+edge
As for Eurogamer you're partially correct:
"But it is a world whose intricacy and realism will cause you to stop and stare long after the first drop of the jaw. The sway of tree-tops; the spray of a decorative fountain; the flames erupting from a burst gas pipe: incidental details that grab your attention for their quiet, shocking realism. Who knows how Crytek managed to squeeze Cry Engine 3 onto the consoles while maintaining such extraordinary level of detail? But this world sits next to Uncharted 2's as the most detailed and well-expressed yet seen on our TVs."
It's ON PAR with UC2 which they seem to consider to be the best looking game on the consoles. In other words, Crysis 2 on 360 and UC2 are the best looking console games if you were to ask Eurogamer, I wasn't totally out of line apparently.
Thank you, try again.
According to your source, that makes UC3 automatic CGK.
Log in to comment