1Stark1's forum posts

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

How are they not 360 shots??Just give up man...Here is DF ones...

Bus-A-Bus

Like I said, doesn't stack up to UC2 and KZ3. Looks great though, definitely best looking multiplat. Alan Wake also looks better in some areas.

Thats completely your opinion but whats so special about this?Yea,nice lightning and water thats completely pre rendered as you can't interact with it.Go look on Crysis 2 flood to see what chaotic water looks like.Better yet,look at last bridge falling,thats sickest thing I have seen in game.

Anyway,you are smart guy even if it doesn't really show.The fact that you are stating 900x540 game like AW looks better is your way to downplay game to "safe distance" from your imaginary graphics trone where only corridor Sony games can be at :)

Corridor Sony games? Yeah, I'm done discussing this with you. You're too much of a PS3 hater to take seriously:lol: I show a GIF that blows out all those Crysis 2 pics and all you can say is you can't swim in it, yeah ok. When you actually play the game, you'll realize it doesn't look that great. You can spend all this time on the forum convincing yourself you think otherwise though. Have fun with the game, i know I will when I get off work.:)

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="Deadbeatcobra"]

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

Proof, or is it true because you said so?

TintedEyes

The majority of review sites say so in some way or form that it is, plus digital foundary just confirms it's the best on consoles right now.

how many sites call it the best looking game on consoles?

Trust me Tinted not many lol, Lems are just taking a few comments and are trying to run away with it lol.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="T-razor1"]

[QUOTE="DreamCryotank"]

As much as I respect Kevin V, I'd rather listen to Digital Foundry.

"The crucial thing is that both are phenomenally attractive games, producing effects quite different and in many ways more advanced than anything we've seen elsewhere on console. We all wanted Crysis on console to be an event, a showcase release: by and large, Crytek has delivered, and those cutting edge visuals are backed by a truly impressive game design."

End of discussion.

Ultra_Combo

GAME.SET.MATCH.

Touche graphics king confirmed.

I don't see where they say it looks better than UC2, KZ3, or other PS3 exclusives. Nothings confirmed, try again.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="1Stark1"]

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

The only reason people bring this up is because of spite. For a LONG time all the cows have been saying the X360 can't catch up/will never have another CGK. Now that it has they are forced to eat 2+ yrs of crow. Not saying the lems didn't have a hand in this with GeOW as well, but it is fair to say sony started it w/ ridiculous hype.

i5750at4Ghz

Crysis 2 doesn't look that great, play it and you'll see. Alan Wake looks better and as well as games like UC2, KZ3, and GOW3. People in this thread are going off screens and haven't even played the game, yet their touting "teh graphics king". All I have to say folks is play all the games I listed before forming an opinion.

Everyone has there opinion, but it seems you're in the minority.

Proof, or is it true because you said so?

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

The only reason people bring this up is because of spite. For a LONG time all the cows have been saying the X360 can't catch up/will never have another CGK. Now that it has they are forced to eat 2+ yrs of crow. Not saying the lems didn't have a hand in this with GeOW as well, but it is fair to say sony started it w/ ridiculous hype.

MC3887

Crysis 2 doesn't look that great, play it and you'll see. Alan Wake looks better and as well as games like UC2, KZ3, and GOW3. People in this thread are going off screens and haven't even played the game, yet their touting "teh graphics king". All I have to say folks is play all the games I listed before forming an opinion.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]Graphic king I think not. lmao>DreamCryotank

Mm, look at those low res textures and MS Paint sprayed hair. Anyone can find bad screenshots dude, just give up. Crysis 2 >>> Killzone 3 graphically.

Anyone can find bad screenshots, like what you've been doing to KZ3 all along, thinking you were fooling others that played that game. Thats your opinion dude. Many disagree with you, including Gamespot,so get over it.

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

[QUOTE="Nolakk"][QUOTE="-Tretiak"]

Congratulations on completely missing the point.

-Tretiak

You see, your fanboyism is blinding you and making you see things. PS3: Lower average framerate, but performs better in chaotic situations. Better texture filtering than the 360, and has better shadows close up. Some pop-in, no screen tear. Better 3D. 360: better average frame rate, but performs worse in fights, dropping down to 15fps. Higher resolution, better shadows far away. Little to no AF compared to the PS3. Some pop-in, some screen tear. Again, unless you are a fanboy, this basically means a tie, or a matter of preference. Not a win.

Again missing the point. How can I be clearer? I am well aware that both versions have pros and cons. The point is that the 360's pros outweigh the 360's cons to a higher degree than the PS3 version does, so the 360 version is better overall - like they said. And this is the last time I'm gonna reply to you. If it still doesn't make sense, maybe it's time to read a book.

Maybe its not better for him though, did you ever think of that? Maybe he has a 3D TV and prefer a more stable framerate in chaotic situations. No need to get nasty with him:?

Avatar image for 1Stark1
1Stark1

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 1Stark1
Member since 2010 • 688 Posts

Well Crysis 2 has better visuals and character models than both these games

TheEpicGoat

No they don't