@chrishayner: I see what you're saying. I interpreted the term "titles" as word representing the movie itself, not the name of the movie. Much like, when referring to games, someone might say "What are the new titles slated to release this year?" As such, I stand corrected.
@alastor529: Pavement racing never includes drifting. That's wasted friction that could be used to pull the car around the corner. Drifting is only used when racing on dirt/snow. Drifting on pavement is for style only. Don't fall for Fast and Furious goofy brand of "realism".
Possibly the laziest article I've ever seen on GS (and that's saying a lot considering I've read a lot of Makuch's work). I was hoping to get some blurbs about what makes each movie good or bad. And instead, it's a ranking of the names of the movies. Really?!?!?
And don't get me started on all of the things in this piece that aren't movies, despite what the headline indicates.
@nsa_protocol44: I love how PC elitists are so proud of their backlogs. I know because I fell into that trap of buying up everything I thought looked good on Steam sales. Then it dawned on me, I'll never have time to play all these.
1500 games?!?! Let's do the math: Assuming each game gives you 20 hours of playtime (we know some can give hundreds more). Now let's assume you can play 2 hours a day during the week and 6 hours on Saturday and 6 on Sunday. You have 26.22 years worth of gaming in your log. You'll only get through that if you never buy another game for 26 years (which we know won't happen).
You may have got some great deals on games, but I guarantee you will ultimately throw plenty of money away on games you bought on impulse.
93ChevyNut's comments