[QUOTE="dstryr13"]

dont worry about it

seeing as how it wont be a port will mean that the PS3 version will dominate

deadhead127

It will be a port! It's comming out for the 360 first! Thats what i'm pissed about! Why doesn't Namco make a PS3 version first?! The Playstaion only single handedly made this series a hit! Thats why they're back stabbers. In other words, no playstation, no Ace Combat. Bastards.

You are so wrong, it is not even funny. The Playstation did not make Ace Combat a hit. Ace Combat and other quality games made the Playstation a hit.

[QUOTE="JeffGenocideX"]

[QUOTE="ff7isnumbaone"]their stupid if they dont bring it to ps3. It would be I was of my precious time playing previous ace combats.junk56

I dont think its coming to PS3.

yea its coming cuz its a timed exclusive. i mean no offense but nobody is gonna buy this game simply because the fanbase is on the ps3. betcha the majority of people praising it now won't want to play it wen it gets released

Do you really believe most Xbox gamers weren't owners of PS1/PS2 before they bought their Xbox?

[QUOTE="ATrillionaire"]http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2007/ReverieDLM

This article is ranking corporations based on Revenue, not market cap. Revenue is immaterial to this discussion. In fact, they're pretty much meaningless in general. Of all of that revenue, only $11B was actually profit. Exxon meanwhile had almost $40B in profit (while also having double the market cap of Walmart).

Actually, this list is kind of stupid when you think about it.

How does that change the fact that Walmart is the biggest corporation? I actually said in my original post that Exxon was more profitable...and that is all that counts, but that does not change the fact that Walmart has more assets and creates more cash (much of which is spent already as compared to Exxon).

lol, now the Fortune 500 list is stupid. whatever.

[QUOTE="ATrillionaire"][QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="killaj2786"]

Yet it makes 100x more money than Sony does... does the words biggest company in the world mean anything to u....

ReverieDLM

Microsoft isn't the biggest company in the world.

Exxon Mobil is the largest and it's not even close. Exxon Mobil's market value is $425 Billion. Microsoft's market value is $274 Billion. Not even close. As far as biggest electronics that would be General Electric with $368 Billion.

You are wrong. Walmart is the world's biggest corporation. Exxon Mobil is the most profitable corporation. Just like Sony dwarfs Microsoft in assets/revenue, Microsoft dwarfs Sony in net profit.

Actually, he's right. Walmart (WMT) has a market cap of just a bit over $200 billion. Smaller than Microsoft, in fact.

He's wrong! I really wish you people would do some research.

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="ramey70"][QUOTE="killaj2786"]

Yet it makes 100x more money than Sony does... does the words biggest company in the world mean anything to u....

ramey70

Microsoft isn't the biggest company in the world.

Exxon Mobil is the largest and it's not even close. Exxon Mobil's market value is $425 Billion. Microsoft's market value is $274 Billion. Not even close. As far as biggest electronics that would be General Electric with $368 Billion.

You are wrong. Walmart is the world's biggest corporation. Exxon Mobil is the most profitable corporation. Just like Sony dwarfs Microsoft in assets/revenue, Microsoft dwarfs Sony in net profit.

Nothing multiplat is going to show what the Cell is capable of. Either the game is equal because the 360 isn't capable of having nearly as much physics and such so the game has to be limited, or the developer didn't put effort into it. There's no question that the Cell is far more capable, but we're not going to see many developers fully exploit it for multiplats because the 360 wouldn't be capable of things that would show off the Cell's power in the first place.Lazy_Boy88

Bull!  A developer won't gimp one version so that it can look like another.  That's like saying the PS3 version of Spiderman 3 looks like the Wii's version.  Never gonna happen. 

Quick Question:  When has a PS2 game ever been ported to the original Xbox, whereas the PS2's version ended up sporting better graphics?

If the answer is Never, then well, these PS3 port arguments are a joke.  The stronger system should always be able to muster up better graphics.  Whether the game plays better or not is a different story, but the graphics improvement should be set in stone.