XP wins simply because Vista itself is such an inefficient system hog that uses so much of your computer's resources for itself. Have you ever tried media work on Vista (Photoshop, Movie Editing, etc)? It's quite slow and Vista's interface is constantly bombarding you. And gaming? My 6 year old XP heap can run BF2 on low at 30 fps and Vista can barely take it on Medium at 11 fps.

Kratos' pecs are sexier than ever. hahaha

Man too many parts coming out too fast and too many games that DEMAND the best parts. UGH. What happened to buying a PC and having it last you 3-4 years?

lol the only thing my 6 year old computer meets is the minimum 512MB RAM requirement. hahahaha I got owned. :'(

For those of you complaining, I'm running on AMD Athlong 1.1 GHZ, 512MB RAM and 64MB nVidia Geforce4 MX440. Who has it tough now fools haha.

This is amazing. The only difference between DX 9 and DX 10 is the water light reflections, which is extremely minor. I reall don't think you're going to notice how the sun reflects of the water in an intense firefight so yeah, I'm looking forward to this when I get a new PC!

It's like Master Chief had 3 facelifts. HAha!

I don't think it matters, but PC is always best because they have things like Beta Patches to address bugs quickly. Also, if you have a great PC games are always much better. However, a console isn't bad either because at least all your games are standardized and guaranteed to work.

E3's great, but there's just so much going on, it's hard to get info on the littler games. Still, a loud, noisy E3 is a lot more fun

This is total bull. WHere's my second analog nub! They were able to port pre-analog games well to DualShock controllers, why can't they do that with the FPSs out therE?