AfterBurnerZ's forum posts

Avatar image for AfterBurnerZ
AfterBurnerZ

1304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 AfterBurnerZ
Member since 2010 • 1304 Posts
Mario Galaxy for me.
Avatar image for AfterBurnerZ
AfterBurnerZ

1304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 AfterBurnerZ
Member since 2010 • 1304 Posts
This is quite possibly the greatest game ever released.
Avatar image for AfterBurnerZ
AfterBurnerZ

1304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 AfterBurnerZ
Member since 2010 • 1304 Posts
I'm not angry like the last guy, but how are they "better"? All that matters is one's opinion, so saying one game is "better" than another is completely subjective.bob_newman
Yes, just like that guy's opinion is that old games are better, mine are that new ones are.
Comparing Super Mario Bros. to Super Mario Galaxy is ridiculous, the games are completely different.Pixel-Perfect
No it isn't. They're both platformers and in the same franchise. How else would you compare games in the same franchise to make a determination if the sequel is a disappointment or not?
Avatar image for AfterBurnerZ
AfterBurnerZ

1304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 AfterBurnerZ
Member since 2010 • 1304 Posts

[QUOTE="AfterBurnerZ"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] He basically said that some of the old games suck. All I'm saying that they're at least better than the new ones.LastRambo341

"Some" of the old games do suck. You're not gonna want to play the original Metroid if you have Metroid Prime, original Mario Bros. vs. Mario Galaxy and so on. To say old games in general are better is false and mostly comes down to nostalgia.

Um, no, you're WRONG. I would go play the classics even if I have the new ones. You have a problem with that?

Not at all, why would I care how you spend your time? I was speaking in general, there's no need to get all angry. I'm sticking to my initial statement, the majority of the new games ARE better than games from the NES, SNES, and N64 eras. There's the random game which ends up being better but it's still a rarity.
Avatar image for AfterBurnerZ
AfterBurnerZ

1304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 AfterBurnerZ
Member since 2010 • 1304 Posts
[QUOTE="InfinityMugen"]

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"] Read the OPLastRambo341

I did and he never mentioned how the newer games were better than the older ones. He was just explaining how there was a lot of unknown titles in between the well known classics titles.

He basically said that some of the old games suck. All I'm saying that they're at least better than the new ones.

"Some" of the old games do suck. You're not gonna want to play the original Metroid if you have Metroid Prime, original Mario Bros. vs. Mario Galaxy and so on. To say old games in general are better is false and mostly comes down to nostalgia.
Avatar image for AfterBurnerZ
AfterBurnerZ

1304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 AfterBurnerZ
Member since 2010 • 1304 Posts
No idea but I hope it comes soon. My estimation is a release date will be announced at E3.
Avatar image for AfterBurnerZ
AfterBurnerZ

1304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 AfterBurnerZ
Member since 2010 • 1304 Posts

DS Lite. Nintendo is going down hill. They are backing themselves against a wall with all these "new" techs.

Calvin079
What? Nintendo is doing fine and still profitting. Their revenue might not be as a high but it's still profits.
Avatar image for AfterBurnerZ
AfterBurnerZ

1304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

34

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 AfterBurnerZ
Member since 2010 • 1304 Posts
Obviously none cares about it because it's a DS game. No one except little 5-10 year old like it because of the 'baby' combat and the crap graphics. That's why no one gives a crap about your stupid DS game or the stupid DS.vik1279
Well that isn't very nice...