AmazingGaming's forum posts
[QUOTE="AmazingGaming"] No, I just mean at this stage everything hooks up to everything. PCs and consoles can all use monitors and TVs, so it'll be the same in terms of cost surely?AnnoyedDragon
This is actually touching on the criticism I spoke of earlier.
They prefer to play on the couch on their big 1080p TV, but come an expense debate; that TV suddenly turns into something a lot cheaper.
Yes, you can hook a PC to a TV and a console to a monitor, those are options available to you. But in a console Vs PC cost debate, using a PC monitor to keep the cost of a console down is simply mental gymnastics, using whatever rational available to get an edge in the debate. The fact of the matter is; most console gamers use a TV and most PC gamers use a monitor, people using other displays are exceptions. Options, but still exceptions from the rule.
O I'm not trying to twist around or anything. I just know that I personally have played a 360 on a monitor and a PC on a big TV. It just seems pointless to me to bring up display when both consoles and PC have access to the exact same options, at the exact same prices, and while the majority might prefer one or the other, it's certainly not uncommon to see Crysis on a big screen or Halo on a monitor.[QUOTE="AmazingGaming"]The dispay is the same for consoles and PCs though.AnnoyedDragon
If a PC were to be hooked up to that display, the difference is the PC could play all games at the displays native 1080p resolution. If however you were referring to PC monitors, they aren't the same as televisions. PC monitors have a far higher pixel density, which gives a sharper image when viewing up close. Televisions use low pixel density to produce bigger screens, but they must be viewed at a distance; or the image turns iffy. You can pretty much count the pixels on a large TV when you are up close.
No, I just mean at this stage everything hooks up to everything. PCs and consoles can all use monitors and TVs, so it'll be the same in terms of cost surely?The dispay is the same for consoles and PCs though.I've noticed some console gamers have super high end TV/sound systems, right up to when we are talking about costs; and it turns into something more modest.
I'd have to question the point of boasting about 60" 1080p screens to be quite frank, it's the exact same 720p image being stretched across them.
AnnoyedDragon
[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]
Wow lots of people don't like it that this game has the "Goldeneye" Name.
sanim02
Goldeneye 007 imo wasn't even the most fun I've had in a Bond game either.:P IMO 007 Everything or Nothing was easily my more preffered game in the series.:P Nightfire was great too on the PC but it's like people love Goldeneye more because of the nostalgia.:P
TPS Bond > FPS Bond.:P
For single player I agree! People are thinking of endless 4 player multi tho.
Log in to comment