Are those really Pc shots? I hope not, since Crysis 1 looks much better graphically, not to mention other titles such as U2, GOW3, KZ2, KZ3, R3, U3, etc
Anastasia1997's forum posts
Just see the link for youself: (sorry can't link) LBP 2 FF VII: http://everythingforgamers.info/video/212/littlebigplanet-2-final-fantasy-vii-gameplay/ LBP 2 Sony vs. Marvel vs. Capcom: http://www.pushsquare.com/21729/crazy-people-create-sony-vs-marvel-vs-capcom-in-littlebigplanet-2/ May LBP 2 be the second PS3 AAAAE title? Maybe.... ihsanqueenThats amazing, especially the possibilities that the community has to create something. I dont think GS will give it a 10, since it seems they flop everything....honestly im starting to think the GS reviews are a joke, but ill see next year
Do not quote this message unless you delete the images
The trailer itself was awesome, redeeming C2, but graphically, that could easily be console footage, since TBH, it doesnt look that good, but I think the footage is from PC at console spec(Since some aspects look great)
For reference:
I would also post U3 shots, but the shots from the recent gameplayvideo are low-quality, so I cant
Water King? wait til Uncharted 3 and you'll change your mind in a flashpoorfamzMaybe, you never know, especially how amazing R3 is technically
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]
This is someones demonstration of a fluid surface actor obviously it isnt configured very well but it demonstrates the physics based polygonal displacement in unreal's water.
lol, thats on PC and is a tech demo. I think you misunderstand me. I called UE3 average at best on consoels, not PC That is not a tech demo, thats been a working feature in unreal for a while now, gears 2 used it.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwqoB6_Wei8
Still, the water tech in Gears 2 is unimpressive regardless, especially when compared to R2'sBullshots much?? Can we have some actual gameplay shots please?? [QUOTE="Tessellation"]not impressive,crysis 2 looks better.gamebreakerz__I don't think anyone expects R3 to be comparable at all to Crysis 2. First, they arent BS, they are in-game quality. Second, R3 has amuch, much higher graphical fidelity in every aspect when compared to C2 on consoles
C2
R3
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"]
[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] They arent, for example, you know UE3, that engine that you so happily declare as being an "average at best" game engine. It can do the same stuff with it's water.
Would you be so kind as to show me gameplay of a game using the UE 3 with those kind of water effects?This is someones demonstration of a fluid surface actor obviously it isnt configured very well but it demonstrates the physics based polygonal displacement in unreal's water.
lol, thats on PC and is a tech demo. I think you misunderstand me. I called UE3 average at best on consoels, not PCsomeone Please Link or post up http://i.imgur.com/cPrJE.jpg http://iforce.co.nz/i/w3iwpnw1.png http://playstationinformer.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/killzone-3-beta-27.png so with the extra 50% of power found, GG worked on the horrible textures from KZ2, larger maps, added split-screen and 3D, WOW. Honestly these textures look good compared to a PC game i just played on MediumpoorfamzUmmm, TC, KZ2 had great textures for the most part. also, yes, GG literally increased the size of KZ3 compared to KZ2 by 10x the average KZ2 level, they added split screen, and the frame rate is much more stable than KZ2's. GG did some amazing work both on the game and engine 8). Kudos :P
Log in to comment