Well, what do you know - the other guy did win :) About the footage: not very impressive, actually. Graphics, gameplay and locations are pretty much the same, it looks more like an addon than a sequel.
Is it compatible with 1.6 save games? I'm pretty much in 3/4 of a second playthrough, don't want to mess up old saves. Anyway, what's there to fit the 800 megs? Can anyone pinpoint the most significant changes it makes?
It has the most balanced multplayer maps ever. I still play de_dust and de_dust2 that were made like 10 years ago, I know every freaking pixel on them, and still they don't get boring. Besides, it has the best bullet physics I've ever seen in a game, so consoles fanboys above who says it's just "point and shoot" clearly have never played it.
You pay for quality. On ps3 every game is on Blu-ray and is up to a certain standard. so you have to pay for that luxury.LunchBox-
Is this why PS3 multiplat games always have inferior graphics and performance issues compared to 360, not to mention PC? So far, being on BD has shown pretty much no advantage: sells are still better on 360, graphics are still better on PC. So, what "luxury" are we talking about?
Log in to comment