[QUOTE="Ayrtonsennna"]

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

Inconsistency on both sides of the argument. Also, it's Battlefeild 3, not Bad Company 3.

turtlethetaffer

hOW?

U saying that people here are exited for BC3 for its gameplay and not Graphics?

have u seen the coments on teh Award section on gamespot?

here is one "what? BC3 LOOKS AMAZING"

another one " No way, Hitman doesnt look good as Bc3"

Dude... you're making a goof of yourself... it's Battlefeild 3, not Bad company 3.

i know that, is that there is alot of BF3 topics already, so i figure changing one letter will bring more attention to this one.

Inconsistency on both sides of the argument. Also, it's Battlefeild 3, not Bad Company 3.

turtlethetaffer

hOW?

U saying that people here are exited for BC3 for its gameplay and not Graphics?

have u seen the coments on teh Award section on gamespot?

here is one "what? BC3 LOOKS AMAZING"

another one " No way, Hitman doesnt look good as Bc3"

But when a Pc gamer comes here and show off Crysis or Metro in its rig they says " Graphics are not everything"

Yet, u guys only talk how good bc3 looks, the Graphics, the explosion, and Bash COD for its bad Graphics then u get upset cus Gamespot gave Hitman more awards than BC3,

so all the Hype around BC3 is for its new engine and Graphics, what happened to all that

"Game Play matter the most" rly? u take credit out from HITMAN bcause BC3 has better Graphics?

Whats new in BC3 tahn we haven't see in tehri past games? can any one tell me besides their new Graphics?

The game is gonna play teh same, and b teh same Battlefield they dont bring anything new to teh table.

In teh other Hand, Hitman bring open world for Spy gaming with better controls and new ways to play the game,

I was at E3 and i got the chance to play both games, and let me tell you, BC3 looks better but in game play i had more fun with Hitman.

This game needs to b reviewd as a 19999 game, no more to say, it is unfair to have high standards for something tah twas gonna release 12 years ago.

Duke Nukem needs to b reviewd as a 1999 game and not a 2011 game

Remmeber thi game was intended to b for 1999 where COD, BC2 HALO were not Born yet.

Can't compare it to todays games, The technology, the jokes, the gameplay all of this is from 12 years ago,

I'm still getting teh game, for some reason i think i wanna feel this classic

No more to say.

First of all, this is the scores IGN gave, so you should probably mention that. Second of all, Duke got a 5.5. Third of all, Infamous 2 does NOT have the worst graphics or AI.

NaveedLife