BattlefieldFan1's forum posts

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

http://www.spawnfirst.com/articles/last-gen-vs-next-gen-graphics-last-us-trumps-dead-rising-3/

"At this point, I’d say it’s about time I relinquish control of this article and just point the reader to the screenshots of The Last of Us andDead Rising 3. One is definitely much better looking than the other. And unfortunately for me, and other owners of the Xbox One, the better looking game is notDead Rising 3."

It is truly amazing how unbalanced and bottlenecked the Xbone APU is. In real-world performance, it is barely stronger than last-gen consoles. It's time Xboners realized that.

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

@Dreams-Visions said:

Why does the XOne use more power? It's using weaker hardware.

...eh, but it does have that extra component that draws power (Kinect). Is Kinect included in that power draw measurement?

Dat Cerny engineering.

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

@MonsieurX said:

@BattlefieldFan1 said:

Your fanboyism is preventing you from seeing the obvious truth. This gen and the next gen belong to SONY.

Sweet irony.

And next gen is already to Sony,woah. Give me your crystal ball please

Another xboner who can't see facts and logic.

Cerny demolished MS with only $50 mill in R&D while MS spent $6 billion in R&D.

You think MS is gonna spend another $6 billion in R&D for their next console when the Xbone is gonna be a financial fiasco? They already lost miserably to Cerny with $6 billion. How much worse would it be with even less in R&D?

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

@kingtito said:

@BattlefieldFan1 said:

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/173127-ps4-xbox-one-power-consumption-analysis-points-to-sony-advantage-and-future-efficiency-gains

I've said before that Cerny was a genius and that his brilliance trumps Microsoft's entire engineering team.

The PS4 is an amazingly balanced hardware with incredible performance and unparalleled energy efficiency.

Just how much in R&D did Microsoft spend to create such a weak monstrosity that's slow, unbalanced, and energy hungry? With the financial disaster that the Xbone is shaping up to be, I'm genuinely concerned that the next Xbox will be an even bigger disaster than its predecessor. After all, investment is cut short if the returns aren't hitting satisfactory numbers. Microsoft needs to spend everything it has to compete with Cerny's low R&D budget because Cerny is an uber genius. With R&D budget cut more than half for the next Xbox, things aren't looking to rosy for Xboners.

Trolling more huh loser?

Your fanboyism is preventing you from seeing the obvious truth. This gen and the next gen belong to SONY.

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

@kkff said:

50% less powerful, yet needs so much more energy, LOL the guys at Microsoft really need to learn how to make a console

I dunno. Maybe Microsoft has decent engineers. I think it's because SONY has Cerny, the smartest man in the gaming industry. No one can rival his intelligence. And that's with the $6 billion in R&D MS poured on the Xbone... LOL...

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

It's amazing what Cerny did with only $50 million in R&D. He utterly annihilated Microsoft's $6 billion in R&D for the Xbone. OLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL...

Just think how terrible the Xbone 2 will do with half the R&D budget. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

old

Man, a lemming such as yourself must be quaking in fear for the ass-spanking genius Cerny will do to both you and Microsoft next-gen.

Microsoft gonna cut R&D budget in half for next-gen. It was already bad with the $6 billion that Microsoft invested in. Just how bad will a $3 billion R&D budget be? LOL... Next-gen belongs to SONY.

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/173127-ps4-xbox-one-power-consumption-analysis-points-to-sony-advantage-and-future-efficiency-gains

I've said before that Cerny was a genius and that his brilliance trumps Microsoft's entire engineering team.

The PS4 is an amazingly balanced hardware with incredible performance and unparalleled energy efficiency.

Just how much in R&D did Microsoft spend to create such a weak monstrosity that's slow, unbalanced, and energy hungry? With the financial disaster that the Xbone is shaping up to be, I'm genuinely concerned that the next Xbox will be an even bigger disaster than its predecessor. After all, investment is cut short if the returns aren't hitting satisfactory numbers. Microsoft needs to spend everything it has to compete with Cerny's low R&D budget because Cerny is an uber genius. With R&D budget cut more than half for the next Xbox, things aren't looking to rosy for Xboners.

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

@lostrib said:

@BattlefieldFan1 said:

@lostrib said:

@BattlefieldFan1 said:

@lostrib said:

@BattlefieldFan1 said:

@lostrib said:

@BattlefieldFan1 said:

@lundy86_4 said:

Social queues are irrelevant, if they prove to be fallacious. Your argument is wholeheartedly incorrect. Without evidence, you cannot simply assume something is true. It's Argumentum ad Ignorantiam, and it's what your entire position is posited on.

I've proven that debates don't always point to the truth.

Listen to your gut some more, dumbass. It might help you in life.

Try not to be such a dumbass. It might help you in life

I can do your job. You can't do mine.

lol you don't even know what I do. And no you can't. Aren't you just a student anyways?

I'm a math, econ and computer science triple. I've taken grad-level courses in econ and mathematics. I'm going to work as an engineer at NASA after graduation.

You?

lol, of course you are...

lol... Not everyone on the internet lies. Didn't I already post my schedule for next semester? Certainly, it's doing more to validate my claims, eh?

that just proves you're taking econ and math classes at a university...and believe me, there are some dumb students in college. Believe me, I've had to TA for them

Because you attended Podunk State University. I attend an elite college. The average student here is smarter than the smartest student at your college.

Do I need to post the exam/problem sets I do in my courses? They would make someone like you squirm for mercy.

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan1
BattlefieldFan1

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By BattlefieldFan1
Member since 2012 • 841 Posts

@soulitane said:

@BattlefieldFan1 said:

@soulitane said:

I don't need to, my intuition tells me that your social skills are lacking, I need no more proof than that. Why get bogged down in the logic and evidence when I know I'm right?

You're allowed to make assumptions after the more socially adept person is known. For that, we need a proper debate with evidence.

Everything after that, we can resort to assumptions and use them as facts.

Exactly, I said it, thus it's true, what more do we need than that?

Nope. Assumption. We're in a proper debate. We must decide which one of us is more socially adept.

We can resort to assumptions and bold assertions with no proof AFTER the debate is over and the winner is found.