This isn't an academic debate. Hardcore evidence has no place here. The topological structure of earth is science. We're talking about Psychology/Sociology - 2 fields that have anything to do with logic and mathematics.

We are allowed to make as many assumptions as we want as long as the assumptions are obvious.

You need to stop playing games and learn that assumptions, not logic, rules the world.

No. All you've shown so far is that when your wife/girlfriend says "I don't really like diamonds", you actually think she doesn't like diamonds (AKA Lack of social skills).

You need to stop playing games and learn that assumptions, not logic, rules the world.

I'm still lol'ing at you thinking your logic is going to take you places in life.

Social skills (AKA Making predictions without any evidence) is more important than logic.

How low are your social skills? It's obvious that in the statement I made, "nobody" means most people. A f*cking 5-year-old would have understood that hyperbole. Again, I just further demonstrated that prediction is more important concrete evidence. There is no concrete evidence that I used the term "nobody" as a exaggeration, but anyone would have predicted that I wasn't using the term literally. Do you get it now? Stop using precise logic to form your answers. You're not impressing anyone and that post you just made made you look like a socially-inept moron.

We're not in an academic environment, dumbass. When assumptions are obvious, we can use it as a fact without any proof.

How low are your social skills? It's obvious that in the statement I made, "nobody" means most people. A f*cking 5-year-old would have understood that hyperbole. Again, I just further demonstrated that prediction is more important concrete evidence. There is no concrete evidence that I used the term "nobody" as a exaggeration, but anyone would have predicted that I wasn't using the term literally. Do you get it now? Stop using precise logic to form your answers. You're not impressing anyone and that post you just made made you look like a socially-inept moron.

We're not in an academic environment, dumbass. When assumptions are obvious, we can use it as a fact without any proof.

@lundy86_4 said:

@BattlefieldFan1 said:

Stop pulling academics into this. You don't need concrete evidence in order to know something is true when it's so obvious, just like when your wife flirts with your neighbor. You don't need undeniable evidence to know she's cheating on you.

Only people who have crashes report problems. Those who don't don't report. Very simple to understand.

Stop using a fallacious argument. Argumentum ad Ignorantiam, you fucking idiot.

Hey, i'm not the one bringing up my education... lol...

Nobody gives a shit about logic in the real world and this is coming from a math major, the most logically-intensive subject in the world.

Our lives revolve around making predictions using scarce evidence. I'm not the dumbass who has taken some elementary logic class and is trying to apply said "techniques" into real-world scenarios.

Nobody gives a shit about logic in the real world and this is coming from a math major, the most logically-intensive subject in the world.

Our lives revolve around making predictions using scarce evidence. I'm not the dumbass who has taken some elementary logic class and is trying to apply said "techniques" into real-world scenarios.

Stop pulling academics into this. You don't need concrete evidence in order to know something is true when it's so obvious, just like when your wife flirts with your neighbor. You don't need undeniable evidence to know she's cheating on you.

Only people who have crashes report problems. Those who don't don't report. Very simple to understand.

No, we cannot. That is a logical fallacy.

It's the very f*cking definition of an argument from ignorance... Something is not true, simply because there is no evidence to the contrary. Seriously, do you use this in your elite Post-Sec education? If so, you are a f*cking idiot.