Well improved as in in a certain point of view. ;)

Since there has been many complains on how the song of the new trailer is inappropriate to the the game I gave my own twist to the trailer. What do you guys think? Did it make the trailer better or SO WORSE that it is beyond recovery? ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Z1EqkcLxOw&feature

The site always had a bugs or so even in the old format but MOST of them were only an annoyance. But the game stacks is more or less totally broken. So by own experience and what other complained here are a list of bugs to be found in the game stacks

1. Some games not appearing if the stack has more than 100.

2. Stacks that have less than 100 become unordered automatically and cannot be changed back to ordered

3. Going to edit page takes forever and a bit more.

4. Edit page only shows maximum 20 games whether or not the stack exceeds 100.

5. Sorting games doesn't work correctly at all. (Not to mention some game scores doesn't even show up (then again all ratings and reviews have disappeared in ratings page) )

Suggestion to Main Game Stack Page:-

This is not a big issue (compared to flaws above at least) but I believe the whole point of showing 5 games of a stack in the main stack page should be to show what are the most recent games user added whether is is ordered or not. I mean who would want to see the games you played like 8 years ago right in the main page. It should show the latest games the user bought or the the most recent games finished etc. Or at least give the user an option on that.

And here I thought this site can't get any more ****ed up than it is now. Nope! I'm AGAIN proven wrong. Thanks gamespot!

@robotopbuddy: So you're saying the ones who reviewed the game much earlier and got 50 votes will stay in main page forever with the seal of "helpful review" and the one with later but much better review will stay somewhere below the user review page never to be seen by anyone? That is a VERY impractical and not to mention unfair method. Does the web designers even think before developing and implementing such things?

I noticed that in some game pages there are 2 user reviews that are deemed "Helpful" over dozens of them. How does the site exactly a pick a review to be helpful or not? By the user votes?

@LarkAnderson:

Before thinking about new features the current ones has to be debugged. Other than the fact that we can't convert back to ordered (ranked), the new sorting option doesn't work either. Only sort by name and release dates work. Sorting by scores are completely inaccurate.

Stacks have a good potential of being better than the old libraries if it wasn't for the bugs and horrible options

So I noticed new sort functions have been inserted, that's great. But now my "Collection" and "Games I want" stacks are automatically turned to unordered list even though neither have passed 100, and an error comes when I try to go back to Ordered list via edit.

The most annoying part is now the main Game Stack pages shows the first 5 games I added to each stack instead of latest games I added.

Nor can I insert new games to the list and save changes

Seriously I can hang with few bugs but the Game Stack need some serious debugging and new options. Pardon me for being rude but when are you planning to fix these, after everyone left the site?

If a Zombie game is done correctly and cleverly it can turn out to be a good game (Like Walking Dead) but most tend to just make "Shoot/Slash Zombies" games which very tedious and uninteresting.

Yet somehow they sell very well....

I watched many Nostalgia Critic and Angry Joe vids but never heard of this guy till now. o.O