Tom Clancy changed tactical shooters and will be missed.

"Oh, Cam, not a day goes by that I don't go, 'ahh... man I love grass.'"

You're naughty, Seb...

If Fallout and TES count, I'd say their history and lore are better.

Also, Assassin's Creed's climbing would be cool in GTA, and Saint's Row (esp. 2) has a better weapon variation.

Rockstar just lost some of my respect...

I don't think there will be any microtransactions. Rockstar is smarter than that.

They did something similar with the Vita.

*sigh* I will probably eat a bunch of Taco Bell even without this promotion...

@Commander_Snowy If only it was Source 3 haha.

People who are complaining clearly don't see that if it was not free to play, they'd be spending $60.

It's fine if you don't want to spend money on microtransactions (I will not be), but it's better to miss out on some minor content than spending more than half a hundred dollars. If free to play games didn't have microtransactions, the devs would get no money, and that is not okay.

I'm also not completely siding with microstransactions though. They should NEVER be in full priced games or be completely OP in multiplayer.

I beat this game and really liked it. It still does not even compare to GTA V though.

I think it's kind of a lame move on their part. They're clearly angry about GTA V's sales compared to SR IV's

Looks like the War Z...

Even the map looks similar.