CallOfDutyRulez's forum posts

Avatar image for CallOfDutyRulez
CallOfDutyRulez

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 CallOfDutyRulez
Member since 2013 • 1602 Posts

[QUOTE="Novotine"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

If cheap ass plastic products are qulity in your opinion.

StrongBlackVine

Compared to the trash Apple puts out there, they're quality.

Samsung screens and phones bodies are trash compared to iPhone. Galaxy with the most washed out screen.

You do realize those screens from the iPhone came from Samsung, right? Apple just ordered the LCD screens from Samsung. Also, on what grounds are you claiming their bodies are trash? Plastic is more durable than aluminum, which scratches incredibly easily. My SIII is a year old and it still looks like brand new. Can't say the same about my friend's iPhone 5. It's a mess. Also, I've heard many complains about the SAMOLED screens like oversaturation, but this is the first time I'm hearing that it's "washed out".
Avatar image for CallOfDutyRulez
CallOfDutyRulez

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 CallOfDutyRulez
Member since 2013 • 1602 Posts
[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"][QUOTE="I_can_haz"]lol owned.I_can_haz
Weren't you cows the ones to denounce me for praising Microsoft's $17 billion in annual profits?

Yes because M$ doesn't have games. You were saying it's okay for them to give you Halo and Forza forever as long as they make money which is completely idiotic IMO. I wouldn't have a problem if they invested some of the in earnings in games but thery clearly don't give a crap about gaming to begin with.

So why why do sales and profits matter when we're talking about Apple but irrelevant when we're talking about Microsoft & SONY?
Avatar image for CallOfDutyRulez
CallOfDutyRulez

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 CallOfDutyRulez
Member since 2013 • 1602 Posts
[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"] Samsung Group consists of approximately 83 corporations. One of these is Samsung Electronics, which makes $22 billion in profits a year. Another 30 of these companies make a combined total of $20 billion in profits. Those articles you read from Apple cheerleading sites are only comparing Apple's profits with just the Electronics division of Samsung, not the entire conglomerate. The conglomerate as a whole is estimated to make more than $100 billion in profits annually.I_can_haz

So Apple dominates the area they compete in...thanks.

lol owned.

Weren't you cows the ones to denounce me for praising Microsoft's $17 billion in annual profits?
Avatar image for CallOfDutyRulez
CallOfDutyRulez

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 CallOfDutyRulez
Member since 2013 • 1602 Posts

[QUOTE="Novotine"]

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Microsoft is the ugly old man with money trying to buy love with young women(casuals).

Apple wins every time. Look how hard Surface and Windows Phone are failing. :lol:

Apple has dominated the mobile industry from the day the first iPhone was released. I know because I slept outside a store the night before and barely got one.

StrongBlackVine

Wrong. Samsung has the biggest share of the Mobile Market as of Q42012.

 

Actually, Samsung's been beating Apple for awhile.

Which company is worth more? Which company has more profits.

Samsung Group consists of approximately 83 corporations. One of these is Samsung Electronics, which makes $22 billion in profits a year. Another 30 of these companies make a combined total of $20 billion in profits. Those articles you read from Apple cheerleading sites are only comparing Apple's profits with just the Electronics division of Samsung, not the entire conglomerate. The conglomerate as a whole is estimated to make more than $100 billion in profits annually.
Avatar image for CallOfDutyRulez
CallOfDutyRulez

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 CallOfDutyRulez
Member since 2013 • 1602 Posts

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"][QUOTE="RR360DD"] Uhh no. As long as they run on Android they're literally garbage. I'd rather buy a Blackberry than a Galaxy.StrongBlackVine

How is Android garbage? It's more stable than iOS and has been verified in case studies from Forbes. Its security is also top-notch and doesn't get cracked every weekend like the iPhone, which has been defeated with simple hacks month after month.

Android is so much easier to hack.

Doubt it. The FBI couldn't even hack it. As for the iPhone, a basement-dwelling virgin was able to crack it within minutes. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-03/15/fbi-android-fail You iSheeps tend to forget that google has the best engineers in the entire world. Apple has lousy 3rd rate engineers who couldn't even make a proper navigation algorithm. What makes you think such a technologically-impaired company would know anything about security and stability?
Avatar image for CallOfDutyRulez
CallOfDutyRulez

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 CallOfDutyRulez
Member since 2013 • 1602 Posts
Less pirating ==> Less used games sales ==> More royalty collected ==> More profit for Microsoft == > My Microsoft stocks go up.
Avatar image for CallOfDutyRulez
CallOfDutyRulez

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 CallOfDutyRulez
Member since 2013 • 1602 Posts

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

I'll dip, or somebody with a little less sense may start to rag on you. However, you're gonna need to stipulate what a PC publisher is, who falls under that title, and exactly how many have moved, comparative to the total number.

lostrib

Gaming companies that were primarily invested in PC gaming. IE. Valve, Blizzard, EA, etc. All of them are now whoring themselves out to the consolites. Microsoft will win the gaming war. I look forward to the healthy profits I'll make from the Microsoft stocks I own.

You mean Valve, the company that owns Steam? EA is almost exclusively a multiplat publisher.  And Blizzard goes both ways, but mostly focuses on PC.  They do have a pretty popular PC game, it's called WoW, there are something like 9 million subscribers.  

Indeed. Companies have gone multiplatform because of the PS3's massive failure. Had PS3 had a 75% console market share, I'm sure many of the console 3rd party publishers would never have made games for the 360 or the PC. Developing for 1 platform alone isn't enough to cover the costs anymore. With SONY out, Microsoft will command a 90% share on the console market. When that happens, previous 3rd party console publishers will come back to console exclusivity. PC publishers will realize how much pirating has destroyed PC gaming profitability and they'll move to focus more on releasing xbox exclusives. I can't wait until that day comes. My stocks are ready.
Avatar image for CallOfDutyRulez
CallOfDutyRulez

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 CallOfDutyRulez
Member since 2013 • 1602 Posts

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"]1) Almost every PC publisher is moving to consoles. 2) If SONY does go out of the console race, Microsoft will enter a golden era of 3rd party exclusives. Sorry, cow, but Microsoft's innovative business strategy trumps the competition once again. I'm proud to be a Microsoft stock holder. GO GO STEVE BALLMER!!!lundy86_4

I'll dip, or somebody with a little less sense may start to rag on you. However, you're gonna need to stipulate what a PC publisher is, who falls under that title, and exactly how many have moved, comparative to the total number.

Gaming companies that were primarily invested in PC gaming. IE. Valve, Blizzard, EA, etc. All of them are now whoring themselves out to the consolites. Microsoft will win the gaming war. I look forward to the healthy profits I'll make from the Microsoft stocks I own.
Avatar image for CallOfDutyRulez
CallOfDutyRulez

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 CallOfDutyRulez
Member since 2013 • 1602 Posts
[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"][QUOTE="I_can_haz"]^ ^ :lol: With such a sad username I expect nothing less from you.I_can_haz
So what are you going to do if SONY goes under? Neither Microsoft nor SONY are charities. They have to be financially solvent for them to continue making games. If SONY's current plans to flood the industry with mediocre, half-assed games aren't working or turning much of a profit, it's time they changed their strategy, don't you think?

I'm not a business man and I don't give a $hit about the money that these companies make. All I care for is games. If Sony goes under I'll move on to PC like I did when Sega died. I don't pay for mediocre experiences just because I have a fanboy love for a company. I go where the games are.

1) Almost every PC publisher is moving to consoles. 2) If SONY does go out of the console race, Microsoft will enter a golden era of 3rd party exclusives. Sorry, cow, but Microsoft's innovative business strategy trumps the competition once again. I'm proud to be a Microsoft stock holder. GO GO STEVE BALLMER!!!
Avatar image for CallOfDutyRulez
CallOfDutyRulez

1602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 CallOfDutyRulez
Member since 2013 • 1602 Posts

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"][QUOTE="ninjapirate2000"] Lol that's not gonna happen. I bet it'll be $299 with a 2 year XBL contract at $15-$20 a month.StrongBlackVine

What? I think it'll be better for my stocks if Microsoft priced it at $199 with $80/month for 2 years. Microsoft will succeed with that model

Troll confirmed. You don't own shit.

Incorrect, sir. I own several Microsoft Stock, an xbox 360, all Halo games for the 360, all Forza games, and, of course, every single CoD game released for the 360.