[QUOTE="Demonjoe93"]
[QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"] So what are you trying to prove? That Killzone has got prettier graphics than CoD, but at the same time, also 400 times worse MP, much more generic SP, inferior controls and less polished gameplay? Sorry, we already knew it.StealthMonkey4
LOL, it's funny should say that Shr33d because Killzone 3 actually has a vastly more superior multiplayer because of it's better balance (albeit the Marksmen class is over powered), better maps,and less lag and other technical issues. The single-player is unique compared to that of CoD. Inferior controls? That's all preference. Less polished gameplay? At least Killzone feels real somewhat. On CoD you feel like a ghost floating about.
I think you're getting KZ3 confused with KZ2. KZ2 was good. KZ2 has no player or weapon weight, no recoil, unbalanced multiplayer, much worse maps,no customization in MP, overpowered heavy weapons in SP, and the campaign is just a copy of CoD.
Agreed, KZ2 was remotely decent and KZ3 was simply a failure, which would explain the AA score it recevied in comparison with the "AAA" game, Killzone 2. But not even Killzone 2 can come close to MW2, CoD4 and Black Ops, which scored AAA and sold millions upon millions and inspired many other developers to do something similar.
Log in to comment