The walk home,
though hilly, is a place for me to get reading done. I have received an enormous amount of flack about this from friends who can't understand the art of walking and reading at the same time. I don't understand why; I'm not oblivious to the environment and I glance up occasionally. In fact, if you try it, I think you'll be amazed at how little you need to look at where you're going in order to actually get there.
I suppose that I've now just unintentionally rehashed a theme of the book I finished on the walk today,
You Shall Know Our Velocity by David Eggers, a book that I had been meaning to read pretty much since I was introduced to the [Order of McSweeney's] almost eight years ago.
Eggers is a great writer, evidenced both in Velocity and his first book, A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius. But I feel that on so many levels, his characters are unrelatable. Not in thought, the emotional conflict of the 20-something is Eggers' forte, but in deed. These incredibly profound characters, who are not necessarily admirable, but are complex and real, act like children. Did I miss the point of the book? I wanted so much for the protagonist to make one decision that I would have made, because I would have then felt the connection. Instead I was supposed to, I believe, be in awe of his absurd decisions, and admire his whim. Perhaps I struggle with it because I'm limited to the realm of non-fiction, and scoff at alternative methods of acquiring peace of mind.
Although the journey through the book ends up being cathartic for the main character, I received no such release. Now I'm sitting here swimming in these thoughts, completely unable to piece them together. I enjoyed the book, but at the same time it pissed me off. I want Eggers to age ten years, figure everything out, and report back to me as soon as possible. Maybe then, I'll get his velocity.
Log in to comment