D.W. Griffith might be the only director actually worth killing.

R0cky_Racc00n

[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"]

I wouldn't have to go back in time. Despite liking some of his films a great deal, I would choose Gus Van Sant. He remade Psycho. What's even worse is that he casted this man as Norman Bates:

Jipset

Yeah, someone like Edward Norton would have been a million times better.

It not happening at all would have been a million times better.

Lol that kid is never gonna get laidrlake

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="Kenny789"]Well most action movies are crap. It's usually just kill this, kill that, slow mo here with a nice back-flip then kick, rescue the girl, etc. Admittedly, I enjoy these type of films when I'm in the mood for it but I won't deny they're shallow and have nothing going for it.biggest_loser

Yeah, I might understand if someone found There will Be Blood "boring" but No Country was so gritty and well paced that it could by enjoyed by everyone.

5/10 - one of his weaker films. Its unsubtle, confusing and convoluted. Some of the visuals are nice. I thought DiCaprio was overwrought and the twist made very little sense in regards to the rest of the film. biggest_loser