Consolessuck187's forum posts

Avatar image for Consolessuck187
Consolessuck187

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Consolessuck187
Member since 2013 • 199 Posts
Yep it's dying *builds another desktop*
Avatar image for Consolessuck187
Consolessuck187

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Consolessuck187
Member since 2013 • 199 Posts
N64 was the best era nintendo owned rare so they had first party rare and miyamoto games. Now it's just nintendo they cant pump out as many first party exclusives as they could back then because they no longer have rare.
Avatar image for Consolessuck187
Consolessuck187

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Consolessuck187
Member since 2013 • 199 Posts

Let's say that Nintendo would, hypothetically, create a sort of "spiritual successor" to the GameCube, meaning more emphasis on hardware (much more powerful than current-gen systems and comparable to, or even better, than next-gen Sony and MS machines), less emphasis on controller (pretty much a standard, dual analog gamepad, maybe just with a touch surface), more emphasis on new IPs (including M-rated ones), better 3rd party support, a competitive online system and low price.

Would you buy it?

This is a serious question because we all seen how it went with GC, in sales terms.

It may be true that it had some shortcommings like no online, mini DVD and some missing 3rd party support (no Rockstar games), but still it was a competitive system with it's own, unique library of games.

I have a feeling that even if Nintendo listened to the "core" gamers, people would still largly ignore their system...

After all, there is a reason why they made the Wii... (you can guess two times - because "core" gamers tended to ignore "kiddytendo", no matter what they did)

 

Discuss.

nameless12345
Nintendo has done nothing to try to get back the people who grew up playing their consoles. Nintendo's game support for any console after n64 is pathetic.
Avatar image for Consolessuck187
Consolessuck187

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Consolessuck187
Member since 2013 • 199 Posts
Now they just need to fire don mattrick and steve ballmer.
Avatar image for Consolessuck187
Consolessuck187

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Consolessuck187
Member since 2013 • 199 Posts
How about some new exclusive first person shooter franchises other than ''halo''?
Avatar image for Consolessuck187
Consolessuck187

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Consolessuck187
Member since 2013 • 199 Posts
I dont even have a cable box.
Avatar image for Consolessuck187
Consolessuck187

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Consolessuck187
Member since 2013 • 199 Posts
crysis 2 system requirements say it needs 2 ghz intel core duo or athlon 62 x2. Yet it's running perfectly goddamn smooth on a 2 ghz athlon single core.
Avatar image for Consolessuck187
Consolessuck187

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Consolessuck187
Member since 2013 • 199 Posts
System requirements lie. You can run way under spec
Avatar image for Consolessuck187
Consolessuck187

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Consolessuck187
Member since 2013 • 199 Posts
Like carmack said back in the day single core athlon64 smoked ps3 or 360 cpus ass. Still holds true.
Avatar image for Consolessuck187
Consolessuck187

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Consolessuck187
Member since 2013 • 199 Posts
What consoles gamers dont understand i was just playing crysis 2 on a athlon64 2 ghz single core and running at at higher resolution and better framerates. 10 year old pc still running modern games.