@Darkhol0w @DFA1 you mean co-op? Most current games offer that. Massively Multiplayer means massively multiplayer... not anti social extremely hard to get a group/fireteam.
@maxbb1 @mariocerame She is right, D3 was a big disappointment for me. Got the Expansion, and still its not a game worth paying full price for. Torch Light 1-2 is a MUCH better value! D3.5 still sucks.
Look at the animations for the Crusader... when he swings, he warps back to his standing/default stance. Poor and LAZY animation development. IGN gave the original a 9.5 and it sucked, then gave the expansion a 9.1 and it's awesome now? At least Gamespot was smart enough to give it an 8, which it's more like a 7 which is what you see from the average user rating.
This game is a 7, that is it, and definitely not anymore than that.
@blkgsr I doubt it, 1 Nvidia Graphics card can be more expensive than an entire video game console. Many people drop $200 on graphics cards alone, some spend more. I don't know what the mark up is, but they've gotta make money on it. If NVidia is can spend $1.5 billion a year just on research, I doubt they are hurting for money.
One think I always thought was stupid with this game, that persists in the console version. Your character will most like not use the weapon that you equiped, usually when playing a Monk, Wizard, or Witch Doctor.
For instance, if your Monk has an axe/sword/dagger/shield/spear/staff (anything other than fist weapons, he will always punch/attack with his hands. He'll never swing a sword or a mace. He'll equip them sure, and run around with them in his hands, but once you attack, they stick to his belt and you just use your hands... whats the point of having different weapons other than stat effects?
The dodge mechanic is a gimick too, half the time does it work, and you usually get hit anyway. The console version is better than PC becuase it was always designed for the consoles from the beginning.
DFA1's comments