Before I get bashed and people say i'm a Wii hater...I own a Wii and am definitely looking forward to this game because it looks incredibly fun and want to get an online game for my Wii. However, I keep hearing from multiple people this game graphics look amazing, looks like a next gen game graphics wise, and etc... but I think thats incredibly untrue. After looking through multiple screenshots the game looks like it is possible on th xbox near the end of its life cycle. Look at any recent shooter released (Far Cry 2 .Resistance 2, Halo 3, etc...) they are all light years ahead of Conduit graphics wise. Here are some Conduit screens-

Recent shooters-

I personally believe the Wii can produce better graphics then what Conduit is at right now and don't think it should be praised for its graphics. Gameplay is what is most important to me and that is one of the reasons why I own a Wii but I think people are giving this game false credit by saying it has amazing graphics. They should be hyping it up for its online play and great gameplay.

You people need to realize were not just talking about graphics. What about framerate, disk space, physics?sexy_chimp

I didn't notice any special physics in Brawl, that differentiated it from melee's physics. And disk space and framerate the Wii has is far from being impressive.

I am almost positive that if melee came out on the gamecube at the end of its life cycle around LoZ:TP time it would look almost identical to brawl and I will explain. One of the largest and most common examples of character improvement in brawl is comparing both Links. The Brawl Link clearly looks much better than the melee one. Is it because the gamecube not capable of producing those graphics? no, its because it was early in the gamecube's life. As you can see later in the gamecube's life in Twilight Princess the gc is capable of producing a Link just as good as the brawl one.Both Twilight Princess games look identical. This can apply to Ganon, Zelda, and most characters and things in brawl. Resident Evil 4 and Twilight Princess are huge proof that the gamecube is capable of producing graphics near or incredibly similar to those of Brawl.

[QUOTE="UssjTrunks"]Melee came out early in the GC's life, if it had come near the end I can bet that it would have looked almost identical, RE4 looks just as good as Brawl if not better.darkspineslayer

lots of if's there buddy, how do you know?

I am almost positive that if melee came out on the gamecube at the end of its life cycle around LoZ:TP time it would look almost identical to brawl and I will explain. One of the largest and most common examples of character improvement in brawl is comparing both Links. The Brawl Link clearly looks much better than the melee one. Is it because the gamecube not capable of producing those graphics? no, its because it was early in the gamecube's life. As you can see later in the gamecube's life in Twilight Princess the gc is capable of producing a Link just as good as the brawl one. Both Twilight Princess games look identical. This can apply to most characters and things in brawl. Resident Evil 4 and Twilight Princess are huge proof that the gamecube is capable of producing graphics near or incredibly similar to those of Brawl.

As long as you get the 20,60, or 80GB model.LuckyLy

Aren't those all the versions of the PS3, so wouldn't that mean all the PS3s support backward compatibility?