There's a ResetEra thread about people being harassed for bringing up Kobe's past allegations. Anyone calling into question the timing and decency of these comments regarding Kobe's past has been banned. Here's a couple of examples
What the hell is wrong with that board and its moderators?
Their entire world view and identity is tied up in their beliefs. So when someone questions things they strongly believe in, they see it as a personal attack against them.
These people are fanatics who see those with views they don't agree with as heretics and heathens.
Don't worry. The corrupt Pam Bondi can't hear me joke about her being Alex Jones.
The "debunked conspiracy theory" wasn't mud slinging by the way. That's a fact. A fact you keep ignoring because you know all the citation is on my side, so you don't even attempt to refute it.
You mean kind of like the question I asked and you ignored.
There is a reason you are reduced to "Alex Jones" and "debunked conspiracy theory" comments, it's because you have no argument.
@Damedius: I'm glad you could not actually state what actual law Hunter broke according to Pam. Likely the same reason Trump did not open a DOJ investigation and just hired Eurogoons to dig up dirt. You are one step closer to accepting the fact Trump did this for 2020 and not corruption as the evidence shows.
As for her Joe lies, I gave you three fact check links directly refuting her false statements regarding Joe yesterday.
I understood your incapability of refuting these 100% confirmed to be lies as a concession. This is what Pam was drilling at, and it's a debunked conspiracy theory. Real Alex Jones shit.
I'm glad you are back to slinging mud like you usually do, with terms like "debunked conspiracy theory" and "Alex Jones".
You had me worried, you almost seemed rational for a second.
@Damedius: But as you know that isn't a crime, nor does she present any evidence of a crime. Her fact list did not include anything showing this. The facts are real, the purpose of bringing them up is phony.
And as a result, nothing she presents on Hunter in that clip refutes the considerable evidence showing Trump wanted this investigation for 2020. She is trying to legitimize Trump's call for investigations by drawing flimsy conclusions about Hunter and straight out lying about Joe.
Also to go beyond that clip, she heavily lied about Joe Biden soon after. You agree with that fact, correct?
I guess we can agree that corruption in American politics appears not to be a crime. It seems to be baked into the American political system and most Americans take it for granted.
Where and what do mean by "heavily lied about Joe Biden"?
I'm sorry are you actually going to address what was in the video or just run around circles?
I did address it, nothing in that small clip shows any wrong doing or crimes by Hunter biden. If you want my opinion, yes it sucks when people get in high places due to their last name (cough Trump and his Kids), but it's not illegal. A fact you are well aware of. I established this, and moved on to debunk her more outrageous claims connecting it all to Joe Biden - which was her entire purpose of bringing up Hunter (and why Trump wanted the investigations as we know from evidence).
Keep up. You must be intelligent enough to know bringing up Hunter was to get at Biden's firing of Shokin. Which as you know, is a debunked conspiracy theory.
So are you saying that Burisma was never under investigation for money laundering?
She listed a series of events. In no way did she directly connect Biden to any of it. Since the end goal there is objectively a fake conspiracy and all, there is no way she actually could give any evidence of a real direct connection or crime. No sworn testimonials. No documents. No videos.
Nonsense.
"Raised eye brows" is literally the only conclusion she can come to, and both of us know that's a joke lmao. There is a reason this is regarded as a debunked conspiracy theory by all fact checkers.
Everyone knows Trump wanted the investigations to help him in 2020, as soon as Biden started running. We have sworn testimonials and documents on it. His own departments gave the all clear on Ukrainian corruption, and that they should receive the aid. Hell, he just wanted the announcement at one point and gave 0 shits about an actual inquiry. Purely for 2020.
I didn't think you would argue any of the points in the video and I'm not surprised that you would resort to using the terms like "fake conspiracy" and "debunked conspiracy theory." It's pretty much your go to when someone presents evidence you don't agree with.
Also "raised eye brows" isn't the conclusion she came to. It was the headline of an article written about the events at the time.
Log in to comment