Damedius' forum posts

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:
@Damedius said:
@zaryia said:

Basically whatever I claim

So you have no way to distinguish what is and isn't a reputable source. You just decide for yourself and everyone should listen to you.

Got you. you could have saved us all a lot of time if you had of been more forward from the start.

I backed up the fact that DC is not reputable.

You have given zero counter citation.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/george-soros-controls-smartmatic-voting-machines-in-16-states/

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/indiana-muslims-muhammads-deeds/

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/washington-state-to-teach-transgenderism-to-kindergartners/

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/climatology-fraud-global-warming/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/29/the-unreliable-facts-of-a-fact-checking-site/

The unreliable 'facts' of a fact-checking site

I found this article on Snopes. I guess they can't be used as a reliable source any more.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

Basically whatever I claim

So you have no way to distinguish what is and isn't a reputable source. You just decide for yourself and everyone should listen to you.

Got you. you could have saved us all a lot of time if you had of been more forward from the start.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

1. It's not a blog. But even if it was, it wouldn't matter, I provided more than ample citation from other fact based sources.

2. You lost the DC debate. You offered no citation disproving Snopes, Harvard, MBFC, NYT, or WaPo showing that DC is not reliable. DC posts conspiracy and intentional inaccuracy. So you moved the goal post.

3. You lost the OP debate. You offered no citation disproving NYT. So you moved the goal post.

I'm not sure why you keep responding. You objectively lost the second I offered fact based links. You are aware that getting the last post in won't change this, correct?

If your next reply doesn't contain links with data that actually refute what I've linked, you're admitting you're trash.

So you are walking back your blog theory now?

I'm just trying to figure out which blogs are reputable or not. You seem to have a convoluted way of figuring it out and don't seem to be able to codify it any way.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:

No, I kid. What I am saying is that if they are going to be reckless with this deforestation, then we sanction the shit out of them. Or do whatever it is the international community does to countries when they need a "time out".

Just drop some freedom bombs, that always seems to work.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

1. It's not a blog. The sources they directly link aren't blogs. Unless you can refute that Harvard study and Snopes links.

2. I have given other links showing DC is not reliable if you are so hung up on MBFC. This is clearly a goal post move.

3. You're dodging your own thread topic because I won it. That's bad.

So if a blog directly links sources that aren't blogs, they stop being blogs?

Good to know.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:
@Damedius said:
@zaryia said:

My blog Trumps your blog.

Okay.

Those examples and data were not sourced from blogs.

So you admit that https://mediabiasfactcheck.com is really just a glorified blog?

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@hallenbeck77 said:
@Damedius said:
@SOedipus said:

Nice wall of text. What is your opinion, you know...to help discussion going and stuff.

Yeah reading is so last year.

No, he has a point-- if you're going to make a topic for discussion, you have to add SOMETHING aside from simply posting an article without adding anything to to it. Postings like that are considered disruptive, and that's why threads get closed. If you're willing to add your valid opinion, I'll keep the thread open.

What drew you to this particular thread and makes you have an interest in closing it specifically?

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

My blog Trumps your blog.

Okay.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@SOedipus said:

Nice wall of text. What is your opinion, you know...to help discussion going and stuff.

Yeah reading is so last year.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/

So is this site the standard? This site is the authority on reputable sources?

The place looks like a blog, which is funny after your comments.