Can't you take your discussions about that aborted fetus "The Last Jedi" to another thread.
This looks better than that pile of dung.
Can't you take your discussions about that aborted fetus "The Last Jedi" to another thread.
This looks better than that pile of dung.
@Damedius: that clearly is a staffing issue. Not a finace issue.
You don't believe that 35%-45% of the provincial budget is a problem? Some boomers are only 55. Give this another 10-20 years.
How much of the budget would it take for you to consider it a finance problem?
Improving technology and infrastructure should make it possible for the US, if they put the effort in. To achieve it by the next century.
And I am fairly optimistic my country will reach its climate goals to become carbon neutral by 2045... it already surpassed its goals.
Listen I'm not saying that you couldn't put a huge dent in Carbon emissions.
What I'm telling you is that some activities require energy density that renewables just can't provide it. It's not a problem of will, it's a problem of physics.
Do you really think solar panels are going to power a rocket into space?
Good! Sickos can look elsewhere.
Funnily enough Kotaku is trying to attack Valve for deciding this with the rhetoric "Valve gets to decide if looks like children".
Like... they don't have a right to do that, on the service they own.
Why does it not surprise me that Kotaku is losing their shit over this...
Which is why, I, despite my liberal leanings are not too keen on the green party.
Going carbon neutral is a great idea, but there is no magic fairy powder of renewable energy, there are challenges that need to be worked out such as better storage methods. While it is possible for the US to eventually go fully carbon neutral, it wont happen in the this century. My country, sweden can do it earlier, but that is because of its geography, much smaller population density and the fact that we invested in renewables much earlier than the US.
The green party is simply put, being unrealistic.
It won't be possible to go 100% carbon neutral in the forseeable future because of energy density.
Any tasks that require high energy density(mining, space, etc) will require high energy density sources.
So a smart Prime Minister of Canada saw the impending disaster of health care. He knew that with the aging boomers, health care costs would become unsustainable so he offloaded the cost to the provinces, who took some short term gains in return.
Fast forward to today. The provinces spend any where from 35% to 45% of their total budgets on health care. This is only going to get worse as the boomer generation ages and becomes a strain on the system.
How does this effect the quality of health care. Today procedures like MRI's can take up to 9 months to get done. Which means many are forced to pay for them privately. Yes Canada has many private clinics(kind of like mini hospitals.)
You can also sometimes wait in the ER for eight or more hours to see a doctor.
Almost all Canadian public hospitals are overcrowded. It's not uncommon to see patients in the hallway, where they wait for other patients to check out.
The Canadian health care system is a looming disaster that is going to require Canadians to make some serious choices.
Why do you think Canada which has single pay does not have our hospital issues?
Lol. I take it that you have never been to a Canadian hospital?
You mean like the 4 provinces representing 80% of the total population that already have/had carbon taxes for years? At least, until Ontario changed course earlier this year.
Of course Ontario is a special case in incompetency resultant from 50 years of horrible mismanagement of the energy file, most notably electricity, across many premiers of all political stripes. This is what happens when you overly politicize public policy issues, which the current clown-in-chief in Ontario is discovering.
For instance, I laughed when Hydro One's acquisition of Avista for $6.7B was denied by Washington State regulators the other week because of 'political meddling in Ontario'. Nice job Premier Ford! LOL
Wynne did a number on Ontario financially, though she was just one in a string of bad premiers.
Rachael Notley is trying to out do her in Alberta though. In 3 and half years she has taken Alberta debt from $12 billion to just under $50 billion.
True. He puts most western politicians to shame and has a sense of humor.
@watercrack445: We have a carbon tax like France and pretty soon our fuel prices will be going up dramatically as a result.
Just wait until people are paying $2/litre in big cities. Everyone with a truck is going to be pissed.
Same thing was said when gas hit 60 cents/litre. And again at 75 cents, $1.00 etc.
The Federal Plan, which I am not enamored with, places a carbon tax starting at $10 tonne CO2e and rising to $50 tonne CO2e in 2022. So it starts at 2.3 cents per litre and rises to 11.5 cents per litre in 2022.
In other words, it is the equivalent of a fart in a windstorm for most people.
That's just the Federal Carbon tax. You better believe provincial governments are getting in on it too.
Log in to comment