I stopped right there.

again...read carefully...I am NOT i repeat I am NOT drawing conclusions on the facts gathered. the facts gathered are that those searches happen more then in other categories...FULL STOP.. do not move forward from that..stop right there...full stop.

it prooves nothing..other than those searches did in fact happen more so then in other groups.

correct?

because that is all I am pointing out, dont make this hard on yourself

again..I am not making an assertion of causation. I am pointing to the fact part of the study, not the conclusions.

do you put into question the actual data itself..again NOT the conclusions of the fact but only strickly the data gathered of internet searches...focus ONLY on that part

I bet Peterson, Sargon and all the other YouTube kekistanis are going to jump all over this nonsense. They just love to be outrage over imaginary laws.

Ah yes and you couldn't understand it. You'll get there someday. Use better sources or don't make threads.

Twitter is a source now?

@Damedius: So do you have an actual credible source to this story other than some random youtube crap?

You know like BBC, NPR, PBS ect.

Otherwise, this thread seems pretty irrelevant

@mandzilla: Uh....it's an international Congress. He's an EU minister, but it's note an EU vote.

Sure, but has he actually committed any violence? Also the main issue here is that one side is limiting another´s rights because they feel it´s morally ok to do so, while at the same time arguing that free speech is applicable to all.

What Australia is doing is no better then what China or any other dictatorship is doing.