DiceofSpades' forum posts

Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts

I'd be wary about "Ratchet & Clank: Size Matters". The PS2 (and PSP) version is done by a different developer to the first 4 R&C games and it's lacking the control fluidity and the background detail that made the Insomniac games so much fun.

I'd go so far to say it's a distinctly bland platformer not worthy to join the R&C franchise.

BarbaricAvatar
Well to be fair the PS2 version feels like the other games. They fixed the controls, added strafing which the PSP version does not have and the sole reason I avoid it. And no slowdown. However, Secret Agent Clank and a couple other PSP ports are far worse...
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts
[QUOTE="Dudersaper"][QUOTE="DiceofSpades"] No One piece avatar anymore?

No, haven't for quite a while. Are you someone I met at the Legacy Forums?

Really? I have been skimming through the site quite a bit so I never saw you post until recently.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts
No, Vegetarians usually have shorter life expediencies and have a harder time gaining all nutrients they need. Making their imune system weaker among other issues.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts
[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="shadowchronicle"]As in what is your original username unless you can't say it.shadowchronicle
I forgot, which is why i am looking for him. We had a couple conversations and if he can find them, then i can log in. Although I also forgot the password so I don't know if I am stuck or not.

are you zeldafreak?

No, I wouldn't put freak in my name.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts

[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]

Haha, ive got nothing to prove.

you're the one that said not wearing the upper belt is better. i merely called you a moron for saying that.

you however seem to think there have several decapitations due to people using the upper belt, to which i asked for proof to your statement.

proof is on you, not me. dumbass.

konvikt_17

That's not what I asked, I asked do you have something to show I am wrong when I do post links?

well that answers my questions.

you're just talking out your ass.

carry on then.

So you are admitting you are talking out your butt while accusing me of the same? Well that's that, both are views are invalid. Good day.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts

[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]

I call em as i see em.

if there are more decapitations from people using the upper belt than from people not using he uper belt, then how about you post some links as proof.

until then, your just talking out your ass.

i like that "or serious neck/head injuries" that you decided to add to try and cover your bases.

konvikt_17

Do you have links showing what you are claiming?

Haha, ive got nothing to prove.

you're the one that said not wearing the upper belt is better. i merely called you a moron for saying that.

you however seem to think there have several decapitations due to people using the upper belt, to which i asked for proof to your statement.

proof is on you, not me. dumbass.

That's not what I asked, I asked do you have something to show I am wrong when I do post links?
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts

You folks know that seat belts are adjustible right? You don't have to wear it across your neck lol.Just move it down to suit your height.

Yusuke420
I thought the majority of cars on the road were older?
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts

Award winning as in many Razzies? All of them.

soulless4now
They are all that bad???
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts

[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]

in other words, you're a **** moron like previously stated.

konvikt_17

I am a moron because there are more decapitations or serious neck/head injuries compared to SERIOUS injuries from having a belt behinf their back? And if calling names is all you do no wonder we are getting nowhere. Did I insult you?

I call em as i see em.

if there are more decapitations from people using the upper belt than from people not using he uper belt, then how about you post some links as proof.

until then, your just talking out your ass.

i like that "or serious neck/head injuries" that you decided to add to try and cover your bases.

Do you have links showing what you are claiming?