Well to be fair the PS2 version feels like the other games. They fixed the controls, added strafing which the PSP version does not have and the sole reason I avoid it. And no slowdown. However, Secret Agent Clank and a couple other PSP ports are far worse...I'd be wary about "Ratchet & Clank: Size Matters". The PS2 (and PSP) version is done by a different developer to the first 4 R&C games and it's lacking the control fluidity and the background detail that made the Insomniac games so much fun.
I'd go so far to say it's a distinctly bland platformer not worthy to join the R&C franchise.
BarbaricAvatar
DiceofSpades' forum posts
[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="shadowchronicle"]As in what is your original username unless you can't say it.shadowchronicleI forgot, which is why i am looking for him. We had a couple conversations and if he can find them, then i can log in. Although I also forgot the password so I don't know if I am stuck or not. are you zeldafreak? No, I wouldn't put freak in my name.
That's not what I asked, I asked do you have something to show I am wrong when I do post links?[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]
Haha, ive got nothing to prove.
you're the one that said not wearing the upper belt is better. i merely called you a moron for saying that.
you however seem to think there have several decapitations due to people using the upper belt, to which i asked for proof to your statement.
proof is on you, not me. dumbass.
konvikt_17
well that answers my questions.
you're just talking out your ass.
carry on then.
Do you have links showing what you are claiming?[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]
I call em as i see em.
if there are more decapitations from people using the upper belt than from people not using he uper belt, then how about you post some links as proof.
until then, your just talking out your ass.
i like that "or serious neck/head injuries" that you decided to add to try and cover your bases.
konvikt_17
Haha, ive got nothing to prove.
you're the one that said not wearing the upper belt is better. i merely called you a moron for saying that.
you however seem to think there have several decapitations due to people using the upper belt, to which i asked for proof to your statement.
proof is on you, not me. dumbass.
I thought the majority of cars on the road were older?You folks know that seat belts are adjustible right? You don't have to wear it across your neck lol.Just move it down to suit your height.
Yusuke420
I am a moron because there are more decapitations or serious neck/head injuries compared to SERIOUS injuries from having a belt behinf their back? And if calling names is all you do no wonder we are getting nowhere. Did I insult you?[QUOTE="DiceofSpades"][QUOTE="konvikt_17"]
in other words, you're a **** moron like previously stated.
konvikt_17
I call em as i see em.
if there are more decapitations from people using the upper belt than from people not using he uper belt, then how about you post some links as proof.
until then, your just talking out your ass.
i like that "or serious neck/head injuries" that you decided to add to try and cover your bases.
Log in to comment