DiceofSpades' forum posts

Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts

Haha that's what I figured, wishful thinking though you know? I will probably end up doing just that.

But out of curiosity, say I had an non specific diploma, then what kind of job could I get? Some sort of analyst position? Of course though by that time i'll be in whatever field i'm training for of course haha.

Chozofication
My nephew worked a Bethesda and he has no college degree then he worked for Asus and now he is working at Sony.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts
I'd like to see you diploma.jimkabrhel
*You're You may need some English(AU) lessons there. Luckily I cam a professor.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts
What if we cut off the top half of the glass?dave123321
There will still be half. Unless you disintegrate, there will always be half left. Cutting glass does nothing.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts
[QUOTE="Shottayouth13-"]From a mathematical point of view, the correct term would be half full. If we take 1 to represent 'full', and 0 to represent 'empty', then there exists a possibility for there being a 'half full' glass (1/2). However, since (0/2) is still 0, then you can't have a half empty glass. How I see it anyway.

Incorrect my student you get an F. If X was to represent full and 0 was to represent empty, then you WOULD be right about o/2 still being zero, EXCEPT the part that is not empty would be added to the 0 making a positive integer. So the only actual FACT is that when you empty something, it will be empty, and you fill something it shall be full. -collese pwofessor.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]

That glass isn't even half-way filled, because the capacity at the top is greater than the capacity at the bottom.

chessmaster1989
TC got owned lol

All it does is prove the point of my thread, it's not both. But many people complicate things, there should be none, hopefully this makes you better human beings.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts

Hands down the PS version. Not only do you get to play it on a TV (the way it was meant to be played), but you get the added bonus of Final Fantasy IV that comes with it. I know some people complain about the load times and issues with the sound, but honestly it's not bad enough to warrant the purchase of the SNES version. Probably the biggest factor to me is the $10 average pricetag vs the $60 pricetage on the SNES, and that's for the cart only mind you.

Shenmue_Jehuty
Wait, can't you play the SNES version on a TV?
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts
 This be glass filled with half of water yes? Ok, so some would say both, one could claim one or the other, there are several factors, there are no factors lalala. Some say that the words are meaningless. Some say they don't care. All idiots. This is very simple, when you empty something out and when you fill it up is what the key to the door of this severe problem is. If you drink half the cub, it is half empty because you EMPTIED the WATER out the CUP. If you are filling the water, than it is half full because you are PUTTING the WATER in the CUP! Hopefully this will ease all confusion. -College pwofessor.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="fernandmondego_"]Depends.TonyKoeffler

i know. i'm just looking for a gut reaction.

From a technical standpoint, it's both. Since it's right in the middle, one cannot claim that "it's half full" is more correct than "it's half empty", because another person could just as well claim that "it's half empty" is more correct than "it's half full". Both of the statements are equally correct. I guess if you wanted to be completely neutral, you could just say "it's in the middle".

Incorrect.
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts

tl;dr version: generation 7 was not as good as generation 6, and generation 8 will be worse than generation 7

Generation 7 was home to some great games and great technology, but unfortunately it fell short of the expectations laid down by Generation 6. When one looks back on the best modern classics of the last 13 years, most of them released on the PS2, Xbox, and Gamecube. Most of the tops sellers in Gen 7 have been good games that fall very squarely into pre-defined genres, and while they have in many ways taken the medium to new hights, it's also brought about some brand new lows-- games that sacrifice single player for the sake of a mediocre online mode, rampant DLC abuse, horrendous abuse of QTEs in place of true interactivity, and more focus on commercial tie ins with bad pop music and junk food that stains your teeth orange. And what's more, I expect a lot of people will be disappointed when they see next generation's games, and they are only marginally better than what current console games look like due to escalating development and manufacturing costs.

Here is what next gen is shaping up to be:

Microsoft is going to charge even more for Xbox Live, and they are moving away from exclusives to focus on early access to DLC. They are also abandoning the core gamer because they see Kinect as being a more profitable venture, while pushing the Xbox 360 as a set-top-box as opposed to a game machine.

Sony is in a dire financial situation, and this will likely end up hurting the PS4. From the sounds of it there will be no backwards compatibility with PS3 games, and if there is, expect it to be limited. Like Microsoft, they are pushing their consoles more and more towards being set top boxes, and while that is fine and dandy, it should not come at the cost of making your system be for gamers. I expect Sony's system to play things very "safe" this time, and that means it will be less innovative as the PS2 or PS3. They do not have an ace in the hole for the PS4 like they did with the PS2's DVD player or the PS3's Blu-Ray player.

Nintendo tried to cash in on the popularity of Wii by making lighting strike twice, but the problem is that Wii is not popular anymore, despite having sold millions. Releasing the Wii U is akin to Tay Zonday releasing more songs after Chocolate Rain: people loved Chocolate Rain because of the novelty-- some people passed it around because it was "ironic," while other people actually found it strangely catchy. However, no-one gave a crap about Tay Zonday's second song, because everyone had already moved on by then. The Wii U is basically the same thing as the Wii except several years later: no graphical imporvement over the current generation of systems, and it is using a gimmicky new controller to get you to play the same games as last time.

The 8th generation of consoles is not going to sweep in and take us back to the good old days, because the good old days are not coming back. This generation has dragged on for so long that it may have actually caused damage to the industry that we are only starting to understand. The console market has basically been segmented into the two CoD boxes plagued by DLC and online passes, and then there's the shiny white toy for little Jimmy. A lot of people who don't like those options are finding games in other places, like smart phones, tablets, and computers. This trend is growing, not shrinking, and that could mean that next gen could be the worst one since the 1980s crash.

Timstuff
The 2600 gen was bad?
Avatar image for DiceofSpades
DiceofSpades

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 DiceofSpades
Member since 2013 • 63 Posts
The Shin Megami Tensei games I've played all had pretty impressive stories.Dudersaper
No One Piece avatar anymore??