@blasterchief omg dude, tom has/had no business writing an article on a game that not the final product thats probably on a beta stage that not all details are public and first of all he dint even play the first MOH not even the floor demo.
you cant criticize something base on a video.
im an army vet all i do is play army games and for me in MY OPINION MOH, battlefield 2 for PC (not bad company) and battlefield 3 are the closes thing they are authentic in a lot of ways
my point is tom did little to no research of the game dint prepare for the interview and had super bad management or supervision, Gamepot should have sent someone else maybe Chris Watters he review the first game. this is a quote of his review "From the chatter among the soldiers and the authentic weapons to the environmental continuity, there are many elements that enliven the campaign with an invigorating sense of realism"
@CageFury and another thing Tom had no business publishing an article of a game that he is not even familiar with, when ask if he ever play the 1st one he said no.
@CageFury you have to understand not all the details of the game have been made public yet. they do have a hardcore mode, remember the super hardcore gamers are a fewer than the casual gamer so this is game is as authentic for the casual gamer as for the hardcore.
as much i like to hate EA. EA is the only publisher that get the sound a weapon or grenade or explosion right.
Everyone is forgetting about something is not Tom's fault is Gamespot main editor for putting Tom on that assignment or to write the 1st Article about a game that he never played let alone going into an interview with no to little knowledge about the game, It shows poor management or lack of supervision on their editors.
And i'm not defending Tom, he as a journalist should have done some/more research on the game , it give him more credibility.
Dieofnv's comments