I've always liked Nintendo. I had NE, N64, and Gamecube. I saw no reason for me to get a Wii because of the lack of games that interest me. Now with the Wii U, its hard to say if this will every really catch up with Xbox and PS. But my advice for Nintendo, which is all an educated guess, would be first to totally change up the marketing. Fire the current people because clearly they couldn't sell it properly (Although it did sell more than the Wii, I could be wrong). Tell me why I need this thing and not a Xbox or PS. Second, make NEW exclusive games, possibly for the more hardcore gamers. Make it a console everyone will want not just family, or casual, or children. Third, bring in your Zelda, Mario, and Star Fox with new fresh stories and ideas. That always seems to bring people in. I mean, as far as I know the Wii U lacks the power of Xbox and PS but in the end its about the games. If you can push out new and fresh games that casual and hardcore gamers want they will buy the system. This will probably work better than rehashing Mario. But this is all my guess, I really don't know.
@FusionRain @sjawz3288 I do agree with fusion however I do think as games get better and better they should improve on graphics like Halo did each game. With COD MW2 it was nicely updated but afterwards they hardly improved anything. A big name game like COD should be able to beef up the graphics with ease; but they didn't. It felt like to me they were trying to do as little as possible and make as much money as possibly. Generally speaking the game maybe still look similar but Ghosts, as fas as graphics, looks the best in COD history.
@punkdsk8erdude @Dinostrich I'd say its worth it in a multiplayer sense. BF3's campaign is not that great, which is not to say BF4s might be better, but if you just play single player you might want to wait for a review and seem some gameplay before you buy it. Most games I get for story, BF i'll get for multiplayer... until it start coming out every year
I kinda don't like the idea of BF released every year. Its gonna possibly start to feel like COD, in that the changes are minor. GTA isn't released every year and look at the quality of the game and the amount of people that play it.
@punkdsk8erdude COD is more run and gun fast pace game. Battlefield is slightly more on the realistic side. BF has bigger maps, vehicles, and it can be slower paced game depending on how you play. As for my opinion, I now like BF a lot more because their is just more to it, there is more teamwork involved in order to succeed. COD was the same game since COD4 with some changes. I loved MW2 but afterwards it really lost my interest. It ultimately depends on what you like to play and how.
You wanna why it was digital? Because it took weeks before the stores even had copies!!! I was very lucky to grab a copy considering the store that finally had it only had 5. But any way the game is a lot of fun, has a lot room for improvements.
Dinostrich's comments