@Thrall_343 I agree that COD is sometimes a good break game where you can just run and gun mindlessly. But I haven't liked COD much since Black Ops (really it was only zombies) and I don't want to be paying every year for a game the hardly changes, especially if campaign is lacking. I still believe games should hold there own on campaign (assuming they have one) and multiplayer is secondary. MW2 is my favorite COD multiplayer, but COD4 is in my opinion the most solid one of the series
COD has perfected gameplay, but that's not where I have the issues with. Its lack of pacing, continuously spawning enemies unless you move to a certain point, as linear as possible, you are babied through missions, stealth missions you don't think yourself, that fact they stuck with the same engine and graphics hardly improved, the fact that you jump from character to character, the just ok story, the focus so heavily on multiplayer, the multiplayer maps after MW2 suck... multiplayer I don't have to much problems with it.
@KingTrax999 My first question would be is then why even have a campaign in the first place if hardly anyone plays it? My second question would be if they believe they have perfected multiplayer, why not perfect campaign?
@NoLifeGamin The problem with movie games is they are pretty much made to make a quick buck. The only movie games that I have that I like were Goldeneye (like they said) and Spiderman for the ps2
Dinostrich's comments