DropTarget's forum posts

Avatar image for DropTarget
DropTarget

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 DropTarget
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

[QUOTE="DropTarget"]

I recently picked up GTA IV for my PS3 in hopes that it would live up to its reviews. I have played it before at a friend's house and there it ran very smooth, but when I play it, the framerate is awful. The game stutters very often and plays very slow. Is there something wrong on my end or is that just the way it is?

Khadaj32

My copy ran smoothly, it's just unfortunate the game itself was terrible :P

Hmmm... that is not good. I will try to upload some video to show you how choppy mine is. I just hope this isn't my PS3 dying again because I have already had to pay $180 to get it repaired once.
Avatar image for DropTarget
DropTarget

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DropTarget
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

I recently picked up GTA IV for my PS3 in hopes that it would live up to its reviews. I have played it before at a friend's house and there it ran very smooth, but when I play it, the framerate is awful. The game stutters very often and plays very slow. Is there something wrong on my end or is that just the way it is?

Avatar image for DropTarget
DropTarget

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DropTarget
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

Wait, are you meaning to say that I paid $180 to get my PS3 repaired when that is all they probably do at the Sony repair center? What a complete rip off.

Avatar image for DropTarget
DropTarget

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DropTarget
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

I went through 3 PS2's last generation with this exact same problem before I gave up and bough a Gamecube. I could not get a PS2 to last me more than a year and a half.

Avatar image for DropTarget
DropTarget

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DropTarget
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

[QUOTE="DropTarget"][QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] But its wrong.NVIDIATI

Saying it is wrong is not a suitable counter statement. I give you a D+ for effort. Next time please try to use substantial evidence and reason to make a point instead of just saying its wrong.

Because your logic fails. Example, while the Bugatti Veyron was being made some specs and information about the car were released. These specs were compared to those of other cars at that level like the Mclaren F1. Because the Veyron wasn't out didn't make the Veyron worse than the Mclaren. And once the veyron did come out it was a better car than the Mclaren. Though when specs of cars like the Zonda came out it was also compared to other cars at that level and according to the specs it would be better than the Jaguar XJ220. But when the Zonda came out and it was put in a drag race withthe XJ220, the XJ220 ended up winning the race. Which goes to show you that your point is invalid and things can go both ways which is why you cannot make sucha claim at this time about the 2 games. GT5 is not better or worse than Forza 3 at this moment.

I am sorry but the debate is closed. This just seems like a desperation point to try to make something constructive out of the discussion instead of me making the correct statement again and again. I am sorry that you didn't fare so well this time. Better luck next time.
Avatar image for DropTarget
DropTarget

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 DropTarget
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

[QUOTE="DropTarget"][QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] SO Reach is a better game than Haze? Because of speculation and Forza 3 is a better game because of hard facts? :lol: honestly you just keep trying to spin it how every you like but in the end you are still wrong.

NVIDIATI

I have never said that Reach is a better game than Haze. Please refrain from making false claims. I have stated that it is my opinion that Halo Reach WILL be a better game than Haze upon release based upon the material we have been provided so far. As of now Haze is better than Halo Reach because it can be played.

:| right here... "Haze is better than Halo Reach in the same way that Forza 3 is better than GT5. The only difference is that Halo Reach will be the better game and GT5 will not" So you think Reach will be the better FPS when comapred to haze which is released but GT5 will be the worse racer when compared to Forza 3 because of speculation? :lol: Still all this aside your logic is still wrong.

I see that you have no further valid points to make. Thank-you for the fine, but onesided debate. I and many others strongly believe that I am the one who is correct. Good night fine sir.

Avatar image for DropTarget
DropTarget

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DropTarget
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts
[QUOTE="DropTarget"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] So hard facts that Haze is currently playable makes it better than Halo Reach which can only be speculated, but you just said a moment ago "The only difference is that Halo Reach will be the better game and GT5 will not."NVIDIATI

Again, you seem to be confused. I have already stated that comparing speculation to hard facts is not right. But when predicting if Halo Reach will be a better game than Haze or if Forza 3 will be better than GT5 we are using speculation for both accounts thus it is fine. It is not that hard of a concept.

But its wrong.

Saying it is wrong is not a suitable counter statement. I give you a D+ for effort. Next time please try to use substantial evidence and reason to make a point instead of just saying its wrong.
Avatar image for DropTarget
DropTarget

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 DropTarget
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

[QUOTE="DropTarget"]

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"] So hard facts that Haze is currently playable makes it better than Halo Reach which can only be speculated, but you just said a moment ago "The only difference is that Halo Reach will be the better game and GT5 will not."NVIDIATI

And comparing the released material of two unavailable games is acceptable since I was comparing speculation to speculation. That is fine. When you try to compare speculations and hard facts, then you are wrong.

SO Reach is a better game than Haze? Because of speculation and Forza 3 is a better game because of hard facts? :lol: honestly you just keep trying to spin it how every you like but in the end you are still wrong.

I have never said that Reach is a better game than Haze. Please refrain from making false claims. I have stated that it is my opinion that Halo Reach WILL be a better game than Haze upon release based upon the material we have been provided so far. As of now Haze is better than Halo Reach because it can be played.
Avatar image for DropTarget
DropTarget

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DropTarget
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

[QUOTE="DropTarget"][QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"]

I'm not having trouble understanding anything. You're making a comparison in which the one game isn't even available to play. You can't say a game is "better" if you haven't played the other game you're comparing it to.

Do you not understand?

NVIDIATI

How can you claim that GT5 is not better than Froza 3? I can support my claims with hard facts and evidence. Any claims to the contrary will be based on speculation. Society and the court of law values hard facts over assumptions thus Forza 3 is a better game.

So hard facts that Haze is currently playable makes it better than Halo Reach which can only be speculated, but you just said a moment ago "The only difference is that Halo Reach will be the better game and GT5 will not."

Again, you seem to be confused. I have already stated that comparing speculation to hard facts is not right. But when predicting if Halo Reach will be a better game than Haze or if Forza 3 will be better than GT5 we are using speculation for both accounts thus it is fine. It is not that hard of a concept.

Avatar image for DropTarget
DropTarget

375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 DropTarget
Member since 2009 • 375 Posts

[QUOTE="DropTarget"][QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"]

I'm not having trouble understanding anything. You're making a comparison in which the one game isn't even available to play. You can't say a game is "better" if you haven't played the other game you're comparing it to.

Do you not understand?

NVIDIATI

How can you claim that GT5 is not better than Froza 3? I can support my claims with hard facts and evidence. Any claims to the contrary will be based on speculation. Society and the court of law values hard facts over assumptions thus Forza 3 is a better game.

So hard facts that Haze is currently playable makes it better than Halo Reach which can only be speculated, but you just said a moment ago "The only difference is that Halo Reach will be the better game and GT5 will not."

And comparing the released material of two unavailable games is acceptable since I was comparing speculation to speculation. That is fine. When you try to compare speculations and hard facts, then you are wrong.