Even if Alan Wake was crowned the new graphics king, it wouldn't be the king for long considering Crysis 2 and Killzone 3 are both @E3 2010.so much for using alan wait for graphics king lems.
Go1D
Dualshockin's forum posts
[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="FIipMode"]That sig is messed up lol. I hate to have the "I told you so" tone but maybe people should listen more when people tell them to just wait until the game comes out before calling them new graphics kings.Stevo_the_gamerExactly. Oh my. Now there's an old SystemWars veteran coming back from the dead. Welcome back DuelShockin, I see your stances haven't changed. lol. Thanks, I won't be staying long though- too many old enemies :lol:
That sig is messed up lol. I hate to have the "I told you so" tone but maybe people should listen more when people tell them to just wait until the game comes out before calling them new graphics kings.FIipModeExactly.
[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]Nobody claimed Ratchet games were graphical kings though. I believe the main reason for the Alan Wake backlash is due to the graphics being overhyped to heaven and beyond. Now that the graphics have been revealed to be running at a pathetically low 540p, well, it's time for Xbox 360 owners to 'wake' up. It still looks better than any PS3 game, much like MGS4 somehow looked better than Crysis Warhead according to GS. It is not more visually impressive than Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, and GOW III. Now post some bull-shots so we can get this ball rolling.Both Ratchets are deep down in sub hd territory(940x704) still i see people saying it looks great...
SaltyMeatballs
Nobody claimed Ratchet games were graphical kings though. I believe the main reason for the Alan Wake backlash is due to the graphics being overhyped to heaven and beyond. Now that the graphics have been revealed to be running at a pathetically low 540p, well, it's time for Xbox 360 owners to 'wake' up.[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]
Both Ratchets are deep down in sub hd territory(940x704) still i see people saying it looks great...
Bus-A-Bus
Some people really hyped it up,but i was never really impressed with it,tech got old duo to 5yr delay,but i know some fanboys will wake up when real king comes back,this time on consoles.
People were impressed with Ratchet, no doubt. But I honestly do not remember seeing a single post that claimed it was the king of graphics. If anything, I remember people saying it looked as good as old Pixar movies. Crysis 2 looks amazing, but remember; Killzone 3 has been confirmed to be in development ;)Actually, the funniest thing is seeing Xbox 360 owners grasp at straws. "Bu-bu Ratchet was in SUB-HD!", "MGS4 as well YEA!", "PS3 1080P 4D hahaha 2006 quotes COMIN RIGHTACHA!" Your failure to accept the games resolution and move on is why this topic is still alive.And the funniest thing is:
1.Ps3 has more sub hd games even though it was tauted to be REAL next gen system and outputing dual 1080p signals.
2.MGS4 was 08 gfx king(even though it really was not) and it was sub-hd.
3.Both Ratchets are sub hd and both are exclusives to ps3.
Bus-A-Bus
Nobody claimed Ratchet games were graphical kings though. I believe the main reason for the Alan Wake backlash is due to the graphics being overhyped to heaven and beyond. Now that the graphics have been revealed to be running at a pathetically low 540p, well, it's time for Xbox 360 owners to 'wake' up.Both Ratchets are deep down in sub hd territory(940x704) still i see people saying it looks great...
Bus-A-Bus
Its completely definitive to anyone that actually understands whats going on. The Beyond3d method is irrefutable, the Geometry Rasterization is 540P. Period. End of story. If you argue, you are wrong. Everyone needs to get over it, the game is better looking than any other on consoles I have seen. Cali3350Killzone 2, GOWIII, and Uncharted 2 would all like to have a word with you.
Log in to comment