[QUOTE="Duo75"][QUOTE="Frozzik"]

[QUOTE="stvee101"]It ain't gonna happen,so whats your point exactly?Frozzik

Just a bit of fun lol. This is Crysis all Medium settings no AA no AF @1280x1024. I personally think it looks good, as good as all console games.

Hey Frozzik, what settings does your pc play Crysis at? (with a decent fps)

I play at all high, with 4xAA and 8xAF @1280x1024. It plays fine up to last level. A little stuttering here and there throughout but i can live with it. If i turn AA off runs perfect but i hate jaggies so much i'd rather a little stuttering here and there lol.

Cool, fixing to build a rig with specs almost exactly like yours and wanted to make sure i was going to get high settings.

[QUOTE="stvee101"]It ain't gonna happen,so whats your point exactly?Frozzik

Just a bit of fun lol. This is Crysis all Medium settings no AA no AF @1280x1024. I personally think it looks good, as good as all console games.

Hey Frozzik, what settings does your pc play Crysis at? (with a decent fps)

[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]I don't buy it, someone trying to cash in by attacking Intel.04dcarraher

Well if they have a patent and proof that the idea/invention was made before intel, intel has to pay, thats what patents are for to prevent others of stealing, or saying we invented this first and reap all the reward.

If they had the ability to make a Dual Core in '98 then why didn't they do it? You know Intel is chip company with their own R&D department, is it hard to believe they had a similar idea and ran with it, not knowing that someone had already patented a SIMILAR tech? Not everything has to be a conspiracy...

[QUOTE="Duo75"]

I'm sorry that you've lost sight of the reason most of us play games...and thats to have fun, not stare at "teh pretty graphics".

The_Crucible

And that's why graphics have always been the same from gen to gen, right? No one cares what the game looks like so the devs just keep the graphics the same. Right?

congrats on missing the point. I enjoy high quality graphics as much as the next person (I'm currently building a new pc pretty much just for crysis), but if a game focuses on its art style rather than its technical direction than I can still enjoy the game. Or if the game is old, and doesn't look good by today's standard, it doesn't bother me because I'm not going to judge something on an unfair basis like that. I judge the game based on how FUN it is. Did I spell that out for you clear enough?

:lol: this is too funny. They say their "keeping him focused" aka keeping his mouth shut.

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=182022

Anyway it's probably a good think, I hope Fable 2 delivers on everything it Fable 1 could have been and then some.

I'm sorry that you've lost sight of the reason most of us play games...and thats to have fun, not stare at "teh pretty graphics".

http://centracomm.cachefly.net/majornelson/2008/mnr-021008-266dmc4-mp3.mp3

Interview with Chris Kramer, Senior Director of Communication and Community for Capcom.

29:04 in on DMC4 mandatory installation: "So essentially, on the PS3 version it's gotta install some files on the hard drive in order to have the game run as fast [on the PS3] as it does on the 360."

Pripyat

Do you really think he knows anything about the techical abilities of either console? Also look up the podcast with the burnout PROGRAMMERS on it, they say that the speed of both are near equal with the DVD only being faster on the outer edge of the disc, but slower on the inside..