yes but not that cover "system" How can a real Soldier see what was beyond that wall if his back is pressed up agianst it?Oh, yes........it's very unrealistic. There's not an army on the entire planet that uses cover during combat when it's available....:roll:
Creeping_Wolf
EarthShakeNews' forum posts
Yes because standing behind of a rock on GRAW and being able to see in front of it was really fair.................V4LENT1NE
yes it is. A skilled player could easy spot where the fire was coming from either get behind another rock for cover, Return fire or
 flank the guy behind the rock.
[QUOTE="EarthShakeNews"]Why should there be a cover system?
I don't want some tacked on press A or Hold L-Trigger noob friendly camping cover device in my MP.
You want cover so badly use the cover system which is already in place.
in which you face the wall and angle out a little either side or crouch down behind something and shoot.
I do not want a system of cover that forces me to have my back against a wall when I am supposed to be taking cover and firing shots if I want at the same time.
Here is the thing.
A cover system does not allow me to Fire Shots and stay in cover at the same time.
I always have to pop out and take shots at a person.
Without a cover system I can just stay crouch facing the wall or low wall, also taking cover and firing my M4 carbine at people that Moan about teh Cover system
And how much good would a "cover system" do you in the very big and open environments of GRAW 2 MP?
ghstbstr
I think that the real reason why you do not want a cover system in GRAW 2 MP is because either you can't kill anyone if there is a cover system or it makes it harder for you to kill anyone if there is a cover system and that is because the only way that you can kill anyone without getting frustrated is if they are out in the open.
And you know that is the real reason and that I am right.
What is wrong with the current Cover system already in place? Absolutely nothing. There are less options and freedom of movement when everyone is forced into a "Cover system".
There is a difference I don't die when I take cover using the leaning method.
[QUOTE="Velocitas8"][QUOTE="Thug_Pikachu"][QUOTE="Velocitas8"][QUOTE="Thug_Pikachu"]GRAW's MP sucked. the graphics sucked and you couldnt take cover IE it sucksThug_Pikachu
"Couldn't take cover?"
Good one. I take it you just got in to online shooters?
if by new you mean been playing them since 1997
LOL, you..a QuakeWorld player? Riiight...
Goldeneye and Turok .
Those did not have cover and they didn't suck at all. What is wrong with Graw 2 Bucking the trends?
Didnt you already make a thread about this...................and only I replied..................V4LENT1NEDo you want cover system in Graw 2? well too bad it will never be in it.
2. Lets say you take cover with "A cover system"Â in the middle of a Grassy Field You have the possiblity of being Flanked from the Left , right or Back. and even sniped out from a Sniper with a higher Ground level.
Cover system becomes utterly useless unless you want to be cannon fodder.
Cover is Excellent for games like Gears and Vegas because they both feature tight close knit maps and vegas most of which take place indoors are perfectly matched for a Cover System.
watch any of the Graw 2's MP videos and you'll see these big maps with various ground levels.
Defintly not suited for "a Cover system to be implimented. "
And even if it is implemented I bet you will not want to used it. It's a Death trap with big maps like the ones in Graw 2
[QUOTE="TheOrigin"] Are PS3 owners really going to know the difference while playing? Felous1Everything is pointless. But it's true, the difference should be unnoticeable. Well I have both consoles but i'll give this game on the Ps3 a whirl via gamefly. and i'll post DIRECT Comparsions while running both version at the same time.
[QUOTE="avenger_dot"][QUOTE="craigx42"]ign already said the ps3 version will look better than 360s and load faster.
you fanboys fail at logic
Blinblingthing
No, it will not look better, the new shader comes to 360 too, but it already looks worst in near textures by far, check the trees, grass, armor and rocks, nothing close to 360 detail tehre
Gs and IGN are pretty much usually credible sources to me.
You posted two pictures???? wats that suppose to prove???
Jeff Grustman smears Peanut butter on the Screen Captures.
Log in to comment