[QUOTE="GabuEx"][QUOTE="curono"]I ARGUED WITH BASIS.curono
No offense, but your entire argument is basically just that God calls Solomon his son (which can be said about anyone, given that any Christian calls him "Heavenly Father") and then does nice things for him, therefore Solomon is literally God's begotten son, despite the fact that King David's son was not immaculately conceived. This isn't exactly the most logically rigorous argument. :P
I agree that it my argument is SRONGLY based on the fact that god called son S in the annunciation. But guess what: I have read the Bible and in no annunciation he marks the offspring as his. God did say things like: come forth, son (which is something to be familiar with); or other characters referring to God as Father, but Solomon is the ONLY character that God himself annunciates and marks him as of his own. That is not a small thing. It is HUGE. Also there are other points. Ok, first, "SRONGLY".....heehee.
Second your whole argument is based on God "lying" right? Because, uh, from what I've heard, God said numerous times in the Bible, that Jesus was his only
begotten son. If you work from that assumption( that God lies), then absolutely nothing makes sense. If God is capable of lying, than who cares what the Bible
says?
Log in to comment