Thanks, but why not Game Rankings?
ElitesIgnorance's forum posts
For giving Crysis an unbiased and truthful review. The game truly is a good game, for two years ago. They were even able to back up their claims by showing the dumb ai and broken physics, kudos. I hope Crytek watched the review, claiming that Halo 3 is 5 years behind pc fps and then releasing Crysis. Crytek must of been refering to graphics only.kevy619
That was a bull$h!t review they pulled off. What? A 3 out of 5 they gave it.
For giving Crysis an unbiased and truthful review. The game truly is a good game, for two years ago. They were even able to back up their claims by showing the dumb ai and broken physics, kudos. I hope Crytek watched the review, claiming that Halo 3 is 5 years behind pc fps and then releasing Crysis. Crytek must of been refering to graphics only.kevy619
That was a bull$h!t review they pulled off. What? A 3 out of 5 they gave it.
Mass Effect ALL THE WAY! Most underrated game of all time from Gamespot! THE STORY was just spetacular! The NEW Star Wars, but less darker because of no light sabers...
Just kidding around, but it still is Mass Effect. I just like how there is a whole new universe to explore. A universe filled with a very dark secret...
I think they both deserve 9's as wellR-Dot-Yung
Heck sure they did. I know, I know, remember when Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess got a what? 8.8 from Gamespot? Everyone was PISSED, and so was I, but when they did it again, 8.5 to Mass Effect and gave Assassin's Creed a 9.
Mass Effect's gamerankings score was 9.2, So far.
Assassin's Creed gamerankings score was what? 8.1?
Doesn't make sense at all. I am never compare games to gamespot reviews, even day one since I saw Tony Hawk get a 10 out of 10.
Log in to comment