When talking about the popular saying among cows "must be lazy devs" I heard from numerous users that "it must be lazy devs because just look at Uncharted and COD4, they're amazing!"
So with this logic any game that doesn't rival said games like Uncharted in any department, whether it be graphics or gameplay, it is because it is solely the developers being lazy and not because the PS3 can be hard to develop on.
So the only developers out there right now that are actually put hard work into their games are IW and Naughty Dog? So I guess the people that made Heavenly sword were lazy because it didn't stand up to the graphics of Uncharted and Warhawks developers really must have dropped the ball because it wasn't as good gameplay-wise as COD4.
Can we all agree that these statements usually said by cows are ignorant and untruthful? For the love of God please! The stupidity of these statements are causing me serious headaches.
Frostbite24
your analogy is way off.....
nobodyis questioning the quality or gameplay of either COD4 or Heavenly sword.
when PS3 fans speak of lazy devs.....they are referring to developers who choose to not work through technical issues due to profit and time consrtraints.
for example. HL2 orange box. the game has a choppy framerate, possibly game ruing(depending on who you ask).
so is this an inherant trait for the PS3 games? bad framrate? no
look to R&C,uncharted, UT3, etc etc as examples that if you are willing to put in the effort you will see great glitch free games. and remember these games ive mentioned werent titles that sat in dev limbo for 5 years....R&C was only in development for over 2 years....and average development cycle.
so if we want to be honest and void of politics, yes, devs who render less than 360 quality games on the PS3 are most assuredly lazy.
Log in to comment