Espereful's forum posts

Avatar image for Espereful
Espereful

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Espereful
Member since 2011 • 176 Posts
i have no loyalty
Avatar image for Espereful
Espereful

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Espereful
Member since 2011 • 176 Posts

Yet while they handicap the PC version in comparisons, it still comes out on top. They even admit this. ducati101
im still waiting on the proof

yes im the troll here who's bashing a game over its graphics. LOL

Avatar image for Espereful
Espereful

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Espereful
Member since 2011 • 176 Posts

I wish my "personal info" would get leaked more often....

ianuilliam

you want psn to go down more often? k. lol

Avatar image for Espereful
Espereful

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Espereful
Member since 2011 • 176 Posts
But the jump from 720p to 1080p is rather large I'm afraid, even more so if we're talking about 1600p.ducati101
i agree when you're less than two feet from a high resolution LCD monitor where you can easily see the differences. having increased clarity is always a good thing
Avatar image for Espereful
Espereful

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Espereful
Member since 2011 • 176 Posts

Bungie owes all of its success to direct Microsoft funding, no one on console cared about them before that.

AnnoyedDragon

then =/= now. they had the resources in 2007. they didnt need microsoft. if they really needed microsoft, why would they buy their indepdence when they could have always rely on microsoft to help out?

Avatar image for Espereful
Espereful

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Espereful
Member since 2011 • 176 Posts

Because they're the publisher and ultimately decide what goes and what doesn't.

ChubbyGuy40

because bungie is indepdent developr, they could have easily found a new publisher consideirng the success and recognition behind their name. it wouldnt be too difficult.

Avatar image for Espereful
Espereful

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Espereful
Member since 2011 • 176 Posts

[QUOTE="Espereful"]so youre asking me to take your opinion over digital foundry?ChubbyGuy40
I didn't ask you to do anything, but you should be able to think for yourself and not let those consolite comparison teams do it for you.

lol. thank you. i needed a signature. have a nice rest of the day. we will agree to part ways here. :)

Avatar image for Espereful
Espereful

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Espereful
Member since 2011 • 176 Posts

i get it

it is so hard for you to accept that the pc venison look and play much better, that you have to start the "damage control" to get out of this.

MK-Professor

ask annoyeddragon. it plays much better. it doesnt look much better. the difference is pretty small, better, but small. its nothing like a low settings to high or very high settings on crysis. the difference between the console and pc version is just clarity in the image really, and lighting. nothing significant outside the fps dif

Avatar image for Espereful
Espereful

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Espereful
Member since 2011 • 176 Posts

[QUOTE="Espereful"]

EXACTLY!

the developer CHOSE to do halo games. not microsoft. an indepedent developer made the decision to continue making halo games. not microsoft. why is it that microsoft is getting all your blame regarding on developer decisions? lionhead could be wanting to only creat efable games right now.

AnnoyedDragon

I think you missed my sarcasm.

i think you missed my point

Avatar image for Espereful
Espereful

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Espereful
Member since 2011 • 176 Posts

Sure they didn't. Instead of producing a sequel to a franchise that easily broke 10 million units sold, they could have just started a new one from scratch, without all the Microsoft funding that Halo benefited from.

AnnoyedDragon

EXACTLY!

the developer CHOSE to do halo games. not microsoft. an indepedent developer made the decision to continue making halo games. not microsoft. why is it that microsoft is getting all your blame regarding on developer decisions? lionhead could be wanting to only creat efable games right now.