Simple, your specs aren't good enough. I have a Core 2 Quad 2.66 Ghz, 4gb of ram and an Ati HD 4350 yet I can barely run the game on medium settings. You need a better PC.
Falconthefirst's forum posts
I don't see the big deal tbh, I was playing GTA vice city at a pretty young age, don't remember exactly but I think I was about 10. Apart from getting addicted nothing much happened to me. Seeing violence, and nudity for that matter, has very little effect on most kids.
Anyway, RDR could have easily been a T rated game, you can't even hire hookers this time. However, knowing Rockstar they just HAD to include some form of nudity. So yeah, those few scenes are pretty much the only reason it's M rated.
RDR is a must have. Borderlands doesn't appeal to everyone but yes its also a good game. I would go for RDR unless you're a big fan of that style of games.
Yeah. It just looks like the same game in a different setting. They didn't even work on the graphics much, still just looks like a 2007 game.
Fix sniper rifles. No glitches. Cooler weapons + more of them. No having to buy a DLC to continue free-roaming after you complete the game. More stuff to do in the wasteland, especially once you've completed the game, gets very boring. More armour + character customisation. Better graphics.
That's about it.
Get a PC, Crysis 2 will fail I've already seen footage of it and it doesn't even have perfect AA on the consoles.Fightingfan
First of all you can't be certain that's on console. Second, NO game on console has perfect AA, both consoles have pretty poor antialiasing. Uncharted 2, arguably the best looking game on console currently has lots of jaggies and almost no AA.
Although Natal sounds like a pretty cool idea, bear in mind that it will most probably have a lot of glitches and won't function very smoothly. It won't always be able to perfectly recognise body parts + movement like in all the demos and adverts. That, and I can't really imagine any serious games being made for this. Shooters won't work, RPG's won't work, the only real kind of game that this will allow is first person sports games. Not very much variety.
As for Move, again I like the concept, PS3 + motion controls sounds very appealing. The only thing bugging me is those glowing ball things on the controllers. It was really not necessary and makes the controller look like a child's toy. Move has a lot of potential, I can see a lot of games working with this. But again until it's released there's no telling whether it will run smoothly.
[QUOTE="Falconthefirst"]
[QUOTE="Falconthefirst"]
Can someone post a link to this footage?
sayonara89
Bump
http://www.gametrailers.com/episode/gametrailers-tv/94?ch=1&sd=1_hd
Thanks. Most multiplats are demo-ed on the 360, and this really doesn't look like PC graphics. Crytek know better than to make C2 look worse than the first game on PC. Therefore I think it's the 360 version.
For a console multiplat I don't think it looks that bad, tbh. You can't expect a console game (even C2) to look as good as a PC game like Crysis running on max settings. The PC version will look much better than the original, but not the console versions. That's expected.
Log in to comment