Fanboy5647's forum posts

Avatar image for Fanboy5647
Fanboy5647

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Fanboy5647
Member since 2009 • 128 Posts
Okay here we go...1. If you guys think someone is violating the ToU, just report them. Calling them out here in the forums is considered trolling, and will get you moderated. 2. There are no "official" rules as to what an exclusive is, or what isn't. There are plenty of "rules" that have developed on this forum simply because it's what the majority agrees with...however you're not going to get moderated if you disagree with them. What will get you moderated is if you can't disagree without being disrespectful towards other people's opinions.Teufelhuhn
Fair enough! Sorry for calling out before.
Avatar image for Fanboy5647
Fanboy5647

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Fanboy5647
Member since 2009 • 128 Posts
[QUOTE="obamanian"]

[QUOTE="jsmoke03"][QUOTE="obamanian"]

So, he means i should post what he wants ? That is a first

My post is about the game 360 gets in 2009 - early 2010, all games, not exclusives only

That is the thread subject, and sorry but that can't change

no....you can look foolish if you want cuz this is a multi plat thread....it doesn't show that 360 games are going to be dope...its that dope games are coming out for multiple platforms...

Well, it shows that you can play all those titles only if you have a 360, nothing else will do

Ad for just 199$ might i add

"Ad for just 199$ might i add" are you smoking crack or something? and seriously are the mods on vacation?
Avatar image for Fanboy5647
Fanboy5647

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Fanboy5647
Member since 2009 • 128 Posts
[QUOTE="obamanian"]

[QUOTE="jsmoke03"]

[QUOTE="obamanian"]

Not really, i still do not see dynamic light beamsn like the below anywher and even if there were, this is NOT killzone 2 anyway, it is another game altogether

last i checked helgan doesn't get the sun so off course you are not going to see glowing people in kz2. going for different looks here...imagine fighting a war or fps when the world looks like fable....thats just...uh...lets say unmanly. so what exactly are you getting at....that fable 2 is a brighter game? cuz thats not the only way lighting works you know....

And how does that change the fact that KZ2 lighting is far behind ? I do not understand you

because its not its actaully better and your wrong, fable 2 is offically the worst game on the 360 and has the worst graphics, even off screen look like a peice of ****
Avatar image for Fanboy5647
Fanboy5647

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Fanboy5647
Member since 2009 • 128 Posts

[QUOTE="Fanboy5647"]This thread was flamebait clearly and everyone has gone too long (190+ posts)...sersiously why take the bait? you know ur arguing with a person who 1. wants to annoy the **** out of you 2. he's a brick wall (cant change his views)obamanian

It is only as much of a flamebait as PS3 fanboys try to make it

In fact it is just a list of 360 games in 2009, many which i consider to be some of the best this generation, that is all, and just an opinion, like every single thread here

The "flamebait" is only in PS3 fanboy minds and the fact that they take huge offense on a mere list of titles for 360

well clearly u did somehting to flame them because their all on you, and you're the only "360 fanboy" defending this thread, so im guessing the other 360 fanboys think youve gone too far neways. but serious question for you why do you choose to be the 'radical'? by going against everyone, even if you're wrong, and defending it till death.
Avatar image for Fanboy5647
Fanboy5647

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Fanboy5647
Member since 2009 • 128 Posts
This thread was flamebait clearly and everyone has gone too long (190+ posts)...sersiously why take the bait? you know ur arguing with a person who 1. wants to annoy the **** out of you 2. he's a brick wall (cant change his views)
Avatar image for Fanboy5647
Fanboy5647

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Fanboy5647
Member since 2009 • 128 Posts
So from what i found out with this thread: 1. If you have eyes FFXIII has better graphics than LO. 2. Obamanian is the one and only fanboy who thinks otherwise (my guess...well lack of eyes).
Avatar image for Fanboy5647
Fanboy5647

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Fanboy5647
Member since 2009 • 128 Posts
[QUOTE="brennan7777"]

[QUOTE="Fanboy5647"][QUOTE="brennan7777"] right. so whenYOU look for a car you want whats fastest. When i look for a car i want luxury. Not everyone buys cars for speed so you cant say "well lets compare which car is better, but were only going to compare speed."

But lets put cars aside, put video games in the example

No i like m car example, and if you want to look at luxury too, compaire a Jaguar XFR to a Honda Civic. the Jag is a better car no matter how you look at it in luxury, or speed. (Aside, im a car nut, i look at every component when compairing cars) - video gamewise, in SW scores are law. The score of a game compaires all of it features into one numarical value. and if 9.0 isnt higher than 1.0 then im lost.

but again it comes down to opinion you think the jaguar xfr is better looking than the Honda Civic however not everybody feels the same way. In video games, yes someone can say 9.0 is law and is better but that wont change the fact that some people are still going to like that game that got a 1.0 more than the one that got a 9.0. I dont understand how you can argue something that is clearly opinion

CAR EXAMPLE: you added additional factors... VIDEO GAME EXAMPLE: If the GS reviews are treated as fact you cant argue it, at least not in SW. Though the GS review maybe a reviewer's opinion (with credability) in SW we treat it as fact and that is enforced by the mods.
Avatar image for Fanboy5647
Fanboy5647

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Fanboy5647
Member since 2009 • 128 Posts
[QUOTE="brennan7777"]

[QUOTE="Fanboy5647"][QUOTE="brennan7777"] Yup but not everybody picks a car for speed. Besides we arent comparing cars. ;)

But in my example we are looking for the car with the most speed nothing else. and it doesn't have to be cars in the example.

right. so whenYOU look for a car you want whats fastest. When i look for a car i want luxury. Not everyone buys cars for speed so you cant say "well lets compare which car is better, but were only going to compare speed."

But lets put cars aside, put video games in the example

No i like m car example, and if you want to look at luxury too, compaire a Jaguar XFR to a Honda Civic. the Jag is a better car no matter how you look at it in luxury, or speed. (Aside, im a car nut, i look at every component when compairing cars) - video gamewise, in SW scores are law. The score of a game compaires all of it features into one numarical value. and if 9.0 isnt higher than 1.0 then im lost.
Avatar image for Fanboy5647
Fanboy5647

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Fanboy5647
Member since 2009 • 128 Posts
[QUOTE="Fanboy5647"][QUOTE="subrosian"]System Wars doesn't have a winner - the war doesn't exist in reality, so how can it be "won"? - The next gen starts when a next-gen console is released.subrosian
Well according to the flawed rules, onlive can be considered a next gen console, so that means end of this year Onlive and PC will be the only systems in the "next gen." Not trying to drag this on, but getting straight to the point I think SW needs to lay down addition rules, and not just be a place of fanboys talking trash about other fanboys systems, and extreme fanboys creating these 9+ page threads that last for days to weeks.

OnLIVE is a PC. The "hub' is a remote PC - it's like calling WebTV a "gaming console". Since OnLIVE user current-generation PC games, and current-generation PC technology (graphics, physics, capabilities - etc) it's not a "next gen" console. - The last thing System Wars needs is more rules. We had an extremely strict, rules-driven forum under CaseyWegner three years ago. During that time people were FAR too serious - they trolled more, they left the forum over petty fights, they would make suicide threads and all sorts of other nasty things. The content on this forum has been far tamer since the Anarchy Vote removed the win-conditions and pointless rules-lawyering. - As far as "fanboy threads" - if you don't want those - don't reply to them. - I have to ask though, what does a newly created account (such as yourself) have in regard to "System Wars" experience? I'd spend some more time before passing some kind of judgement on what works, and what doesn't.

Interesting response, though the way SW is now people classify things how ever seems fit, just look at the NGS2 debate currently going on. - And I may not reply to a fanboy thread but they go on forever and usually knock other threads down the list. Most fanboy threads end in 2 or 3 people arguing for page after page. - :P no comment