FatedX360's forum posts

Avatar image for FatedX360
FatedX360

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 FatedX360
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="Insecticidius"]Well Trophies are better FACT. Because you can use them as simplfied streamlined or complex and deep, gamerscore doesn't give you a choice, it's just numbers. So FACT is Trophies are much better then gamerscore. Not an opinion at all really. Insecticidius

Dunno man..looks like an opinion to me.

Nope. Look at it this way. On one side you have Numbers 123123123. On the other side you have numbers 123123123 AND letters abcabcabc. So 2>1. Trophies are like the xbox 360 and Gamerscore is the original Xbox. Trophies is the advancement, more evolved, more complex but if you want you can keeo it simple... Gamerscore gives you no choice. Fact really.

Achievements can be as complex as you say Trophies are. Its really a matter of opinion and preference. Your opinion does not equal fact. FACT IS: they are both reward systems. THAT IS FACT. Saying Trophies are better than Achievements and vice versa falls under opinion. I prefer Achievements, I honestly don't care how many trophies of a specific color i have or what level I am because of them. A simplified number system is fine by me, i can still check which achievements i've gotten and keep track of what I haven't as well. In the end, whatever your gamerscore is or what level you are, its trivial to the real gaming experience. Sure finally getting that one achievement/trophy gives you the feeling that you just conquered the world and bragging rights, but its the experience in that that matters most.
Avatar image for FatedX360
FatedX360

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 FatedX360
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts

why should we care about 2005 gpus at this point ?

dontshackzmii
He's just looking for the link
Avatar image for FatedX360
FatedX360

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 FatedX360
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]Things are about to get very interesting in SW.xsubtownerx

How exactly ? A Halo game scoring high is nothing new.

It's an unofficial fact that if Reach doesn't get a 10, the earth will implode.

its AAA at best from what I feel, most people will agree with that. I really dont see it getting a 10...if it does, kick me in the face with a boot please
Avatar image for FatedX360
FatedX360

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 FatedX360
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="FatedX360"][QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]Game informer gave Uncharted 2 a 10. flop incoming? :P

In b4 UC2 scored better... I hear the the drums beating and the trumpets flaring...i think the Lem vs. Cow war on this thread is about to start

The Drums will beat 4 times

I think i see their respective flags blowing in the wind....*Q epic Braveheart music*
Avatar image for FatedX360
FatedX360

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 FatedX360
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts
[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]Game informer gave Uncharted 2 a 10. flop incoming? :P

In b4 UC2 scored better... I hear the the drums beating and the trumpets flaring...i think the Lem vs. Cow war on this thread is about to start
Avatar image for FatedX360
FatedX360

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 FatedX360
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts
im surprised it didnt get a 10 though GI is pretty easyTintedEyes
Personally i never felt it would get a 10, Halo isn't known, to me atleast, to be the ultimate FPS powerhouse. Its just fun and entertaining to play, specially with friend. The rest of the Reach reviews should be coming out later today, I'm perfectly happy with it getting a 9-9.5, if it gets a 10...I as well as the rest of SW would blow up into a billion pieces and scream Holy Schnitz
Avatar image for FatedX360
FatedX360

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 FatedX360
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts

Thats a great score but not the best sign. GI tends to overrate games!

PAL360
I'll be happy with it either way. Bungie's last hurrah to a cultural icon is saddening but it also gives me a happy feeling inside. lol
Avatar image for FatedX360
FatedX360

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 FatedX360
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts
Awesome. Although the GS, IGN, reviews are all that matter to me.racing1750
The rest of the reviews are supposed to come out later on today, according to sources reviews were held off from release til today
Avatar image for FatedX360
FatedX360

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 FatedX360
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts

Thought I'd share

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=264120

The world's first Halo Reach review has landed - with respected US mag Game Informer giving the Bungie game a whopping 95 per cent score.

The mag calls the title - which is released worldwide on Tuesday - "the true follow up to Halo 3".

GI's review is the first mainstream write-up available. The rest of the online reviews are due to golive tomorrow morning at 5am, UK time.
GI writes: 'Any disappointment series fans felt after ODST should be completely washed away thanks to Reach. Make no mistake about it - this is the true follow-up to Halo 3. It's also a perfect way for Bungie to part with the series it turned into a phenomenon.'

Reports suggest that UK indie retailers and supermarkets arealready selling the game three days early.

Avatar image for FatedX360
FatedX360

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 FatedX360
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts

This looks ALOT better than the other videos i saw, the gameplay looks fun and graphics look like Killzone level or better to me (I only played Killzone 2 demo).

Keiji993

Yeah the frame rate looks solid as well