Flamingthief's forum posts

Avatar image for Flamingthief
Flamingthief

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Flamingthief
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

well thats pretty sad , on AMD's part.

Avatar image for Flamingthief
Flamingthief

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Flamingthief
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

What motherboards support SATA 6.0Gb/s and have AMD 3 socket types

Avatar image for Flamingthief
Flamingthief

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Flamingthief
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

are there any channel dedicated towards new technology in computer or REALLY good sites with constant updates.

For channels if you know please give the channel # that corresponds on a tv with comcast as the provider

Avatar image for Flamingthief
Flamingthief

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Flamingthief
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

[QUOTE="Captain__Tripps"]What sort of raid are you running? But no, it doesn't have to be exactly identical.Same size/speed/interface is really all you need to worry about usually...dghillza

I'm busy building a new system using the Corsair 800D case of which I plan on installing 4 HDD's most likely Seagate Barraguda 1TB and set it up in a raid 5but I'm pondering if going for that protection is worth it should adrive fail later will Ibe able to get another drive that caneasily replace the failed one.

it only protects you for only 1 drive failure as the safe as other RAIDs and a single failure in RAID 5 while it does not mean a lost of data suffers a lose of performance

Avatar image for Flamingthief
Flamingthief

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Flamingthief
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

if he talkin about usig 4 harddrives then he probably using RAID 5 or 0+1

RAID 0+1 means two harddrives have data spread across and two back-ups of each thus better performance and protection

I would recommend RAID 0+1 since you could probably find similar drives if one were to fail years later and it offers much faster performance

Avatar image for Flamingthief
Flamingthief

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Flamingthief
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

if itwas suppose to be this year they must havesome information about it onlinesomewhere sides it supports DirectX11 and the architecture.

Avatar image for Flamingthief
Flamingthief

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Flamingthief
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

well guess i will wait to build my rig until it comes out

Avatar image for Flamingthief
Flamingthief

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Flamingthief
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

pretty much what are its specs if annoucned and when is it going to be released?

Avatar image for Flamingthief
Flamingthief

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Flamingthief
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

[QUOTE="Flamingthief"]

question about window 7 how much RAM can it utilize ,since vista could only utilize 4GB

MonsieurX

Any 32 bits OS will use max 4gb...

how about a 64 bit since it seems like a better choice if it can ulitize more RAM....

Avatar image for Flamingthief
Flamingthief

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Flamingthief
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

question about window 7 how much RAM can it utilize ,since vista could only utilize 4GB