[QUOTE="Flotsam"][QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="Flotsam"][QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="Flotsam"][QUOTE="twinsfan12"][QUOTE="Flotsam"][QUOTE="twinsfan12"][QUOTE="Flotsam"][QUOTE="twinsfan12"][QUOTE="Flotsam"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="Half-Life_man"] Russia is frickin huge he better not be poking around in their business, we'll all be banished to Siberia.
Vuurk
Russia would get their ass kicked, 80% of their people live on the very west part of their country. Their military technology is decades behind ours.Nukes never gets old, russia has twice as many nukes.
you sure about, mind giving me a source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons
apparently only 6000 are active so they wouldnt be able to use 20000
What they mean by active is that its ready to be fired. Total there are 16000.
so whats the time frame for using the other 10000
Meh, 6000 is enough
You would have to fuel the new nukes and set them up would be very time consuming.
You dont need 6000 nukes anyway you just need 2, 1 for moscow and 1 for st.petersburg, russia gone
Well same goes for USA, one for New Yourk another goes to Washington.
Los angles, Denver, Houston, , Boston to name a few
The uks at risk you need just 1 london
And what people from those cities will take m16's and go to war?
You obviously have NO IDEA what you're talking about. The U.S. military is made up of people from EVERY state and there are military bases in EVERY state. That was an ignorant statement. M16s aren't even the key to war. It's about aircraft.
So goes same thing for russia, its 3 times biggesr than US.
Log in to comment