Fondness' forum posts

Avatar image for Fondness
Fondness

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Fondness
Member since 2008 • 902 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="leejohnson7"]

Actually I think it is one of those games that shouldn't have a sequel; the core gameplay was all flash over substance way back when the first came out. By now I should imagine that people have had their fix of that laggy online play and strange chainsaw animations.

I mean look at that crap... two people chainsawing each others guns.... It just wouldn't happen, and why does the locust just decide to stop fighting and stand there and take a chainsaw to the head after a dual? Never understood the concept of chainsaws in combat... It just wouldn't work at all.

leejohnson7

I think you missed the point completely if you're going to criticise gears for more flash than substance. It's like having a pop at Indiana Jones for not having intricate dialogue. Gears was all about pure, unadulterated fun. It was an action game from start to finish. You had a ball because you're playing as such a badass, with a small squad of fellow-badasses, taking it to the bad guys in the most intense, visceral, flashy manner possible.

Also, the locust doesn't just stop fighting. You clearly over-power him and slash the chainsaw down on him. Hence why the movement is so quick compared to the normal chainsaw attack. And when questioning the realism of chainsaws in battle; you realise you're playing as a man wearing about a tonne of armour, with boots with size of most people's torsos, who can soak up a burst of machine gun in the chest, and just grunt it off? Who carries a gun the size of something you'd get on the back of a hummer.

Come on.

The game is based off real life concepts, to a degree. Rambo can accurately fire two heavy machine guns at the same time from a standing position when it is inaccurate from a prone position with only one, but it isn't that hard to believe.

The chainsaw dual looked bad.... It showed two guys doing some leaning into one another, and all of a sudden, one of them just gave up and then the older animation came back in... You know the one, where you wiggle your arms instead of walking or leaning backwards as your natural reflexes would make you do (because for that chainsaw to do mortal damage while you are stood up, you would literally have to lean against it).

Now okay... I see what you mean, but it simply pissed me off online when I was running away, but then I turned around and wiggled my arms and got suckered into some lame instant and predictable kill.

Things that "look" cool at a first glance don't work well in a competitive and repetitive online game mode, it just attracts a rather annoying community of scrubs who make up their own rules about what guns you can and can't use with or without being called a "n00b".

Obviously, Marcus Fenix has greater physical power. :)

Avatar image for Fondness
Fondness

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Fondness
Member since 2008 • 902 Posts
[QUOTE="Mark36111"]


The better question is why do Dom and Carmine II just stand around with their thumbs up their asses instead of helping Marcus.

On that note, hopefully they've taken chainsaw invulnerability out of the game so that you can kill opposing players while they are dueling.

thrones

Pre-alpha, I'm sure they'll fix it. The same way they'll hopefully fix the entire 'arm falling off' thing when you get stabbed in the back by a chainsaw.

I noticed that, as well. :|

Avatar image for Fondness
Fondness

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Fondness
Member since 2008 • 902 Posts
[QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="thrones"][QUOTE="Fondness"]

Your signature profoundly is pleasant to look at.

Mark36111

There is something about staring at the locust being chopped in half..again...and again...

What does that guy do behind him? Flick the locust's ear?


The better question is why do Dom and Carmine II just stand around with their thumbs up their asses instead of helping Marcus.

On that note, hopefully they've taken chainsaw invulnerability out of the game so that you can kill opposing players while they are dueling.

Strange...

Avatar image for Fondness
Fondness

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Fondness
Member since 2008 • 902 Posts
[QUOTE="Fondness"][QUOTE="Saturos3091"][QUOTE="leejohnson7"][QUOTE="crunchUK"]

now watch as the cows come... despite the fact that more players would just make it ocmpetely random and unchallenging. hope they get rid of shotguns though...

leejohnson7


No way... the laggiest, chanciest, hostiest, instagib weapon is the one that takes the most SKILLZ.



That and the one shot kill cannon (longshot) take insane skyllz!

Really now, with 5v5 online I'm a bit worried. I'd hope for more, but I'm hoping they balance the core gameplay and weapons before they decide to up the number of players.

I agree!

Actually I think it is one of those games that shouldn't have a sequel; the core gameplay was all flash over substance way back when the first came out. By now I should imagine that people have had their fix of that laggy online play and strange chainsaw animations.

I mean look at that crap... two people chainsawing each others guns.... It just wouldn't happen, and why does the locust just decide to stop fighting and stand there and take a chainsaw to the head after a dual? Never understood the concept of chainsaws in combat... It just wouldn't work at all.

It's splendid.

Avatar image for Fondness
Fondness

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Fondness
Member since 2008 • 902 Posts

Guys, everyone knows that more players online = better game. Cedmin is totally right.

Thats why Resistance was GOTY and Gears was considered a huge flop.

Wait a sec...

Mercenary343

No.

Avatar image for Fondness
Fondness

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Fondness
Member since 2008 • 902 Posts
[QUOTE="leejohnson7"][QUOTE="crunchUK"]

now watch as the cows come... despite the fact that more players would just make it ocmpetely random and unchallenging. hope they get rid of shotguns though...

Saturos3091


No way... the laggiest, chanciest, hostiest, instagib weapon is the one that takes the most SKILLZ.



That and the one shot kill cannon (longshot) take insane skyllz!

Really now, with 5v5 online I'm a bit worried. I'd hope for more, but I'm hoping they balance the core gameplay and weapons before they decide to up the number of players.

I agree!

Avatar image for Fondness
Fondness

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Fondness
Member since 2008 • 902 Posts

Resistance 2 will have much better online than Gears 2. Confirmed.AC-360

No. Nothing is shown to be true.

Avatar image for Fondness
Fondness

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Fondness
Member since 2008 • 902 Posts
[QUOTE="Fondness"][QUOTE="thrones"][QUOTE="ChevelleFan"]

So you are saying you died first all the time?

BTW the MP for Resistance SUCKED! What makes anyone think it will be any different? So adding even more people into the jumbled mess makes the game better? Cows are quick to point a lack of innovation in Gears 2 when they boast about Resistance 2. Two totally different games that play completely different. Talk about hypocracy.

thrones

I prefered Resistance multiplat over Gears multiplayer to be honest, held me over till Halo 3.

What do you think about Halo 3's multiplayer? I find it, somewhat, tedious.

Halo 3's multiplayer is awesome. Especially custom games, because you can create a crazy map in Forge and then go play on it with your friends. The only thing that would've made it more awesome is the use of a server list with Custom games, so instead of playing just with friends you can also go onto different's people's custom maps and game modes to test it out.

The standard game modes were also quite good. Except Crazy King of the Hill. Nobody likes Crazy King of the Hill.

Why not?

Avatar image for Fondness
Fondness

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Fondness
Member since 2008 • 902 Posts

5 vs 5 is better than 4 vs 4 but is it better than 30 vs 30? We shall find out in November- Gears vs Resistance: The Rematch

I'd like to point out that you don't have to play 30 vs 30 in Resistance 2, you can play smaller games.

Floppy_Jim

Time will tell. I hold quality superior.

Avatar image for Fondness
Fondness

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Fondness
Member since 2008 • 902 Posts

I think they should just go all the way and make it 6 vs 6 so you can have three groups of splitscreen guests on both sides. Sure 5 vs 5 will probably work but it would be a lot less messy if they just stepped it up two playersChevelleFan

What about bigger maps?