[QUOTE="Games4thewin"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"] agree Halo had decent multyplayer but a horrible single player. Crysis does good in both but the Single player was the best part.skrat_01

No, Halo 3 had an epic SP. :)

The multiplayer uneuqstionably isn't amazing. It's pretty entertaining sometimes, but Xbox 360's best multiplayer game definitely is Gears of War.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="Kratos-Sackboy"]Best Lineup?! For 08 :|. Micheal Pachter!? Teamxbox 2.0 ::?MKLOL

It seems you don't own an Xbox 360. Is that correct? I'm assuming that'd be a yes.

The reviews said that another console had more games that scored higher...

:(

[QUOTE="KrazyKenKutarag"]

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]Graphics = fun I guess in your world I'll take Halo 3 over Crysis any day. JangoWuzHere

I found Crysis to have much more engaging gameplay than any Halo game. To each his own.

No, Halo 3 had an epic SP. :)

The Hermits here are by far the most annoying group above all else. Why is this being debated? MGS4 won clearly and anything else said is menaingless. Those who do not agree can go to a site that shares their same opinion of the highly overrated game Crysis.Gaming_Guru_Guy

No, everything else is fact.

This is awesome news for all Wii owners, your system of choice has sold the most consoles, way more than the 360 and PS3. This without a doubt proves that the Wii is the best system!

p2250

It also proves PC > all combined.

So PC owns your little Wii by your logic.

Bye.

[QUOTE="Games4thewin"]

No game - NO GAME - seriously stands a chance graphically on consoles. NO GAME.

NO GAME. :evil:

Seriously, how can people even state that Gears of War 2 or Metal Gear Solid 4 have better graphics (GameSpot, Gametrailers)? :shock:

Crysis has the best graphics, by far. This is reality. This is fact!

sethman410

All the weeping fanboys that trust GameSpot and haven't played Crysis. :lol:

As far as overall scale and detail, Crysis wins. However, the animation pales in comparison to Metal Gear Solid 4. The soft body physics are easily overshadowed by Gears of War 2. As much as I hate to say it, Far Cry 2 has better-looking foliage. Killzone 2 is on the way and in many ways is actually a better-looking game, specifically the lighting and character models. Sorry, but Crysis is falling behind. Fear not, however, as Crytek will surely up the ante once more with their next game, and you'll have something new to fight for.

Corey_Barlog_SM

It must be hard for you, but no game comes close to it. I guess Crytek was right - Crysis will be the best for two or three years.

[QUOTE="Games4thewin"][QUOTE="st1ka"] According to metacritic the PS3 has the most critically acclaimed gamesst1ka

Metacritic sucks. Game Rankings is much better, that only focuses on games. GR is a more accurate presentation of a game's overall quality.

But it's better than MC.

[QUOTE="Games4thewin"][QUOTE="hfgjhgjghjghjgh"]

the people working for media know less than me

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cciPESLNTFY&feature=related

Socom Confrontation Jumping Spots

socom's gameplay is far superior to terrible controls/no jumping gears of war.

hfgjhgjghjghjgh

That looks boring. And Gears of War has tremendous controls, and jumping would merely make the game lame.

Umm....how about you play gears of war and then socom?

i have played both socom's controls are better and no jumping makes the game suck....that's really lame a roll instead of a jump LMFAO! what a noob game.

that looks boring because he's in a map by himself showing you a camping spot he found by JUMPING.

lol you cant explore levels in gears of war stuck to ground/magnetized pos.

Jumping would suck in Gears of War. And I couldn't care less if you can't explore anything since the game is awesome.