a couple of reasons i can think of that are probably wrong:
A permanent satellite means geostationary orbit, which is around 22000 miles above the equator. And for a surveillance satellite to provide the sort of information needed on the surface (ie, troop and armour movements etc) in enough detail, it just would be too difficult. Not only that, if there is cloud cover (in Iraq, im not sure), then proper surveillance isnt possible.
It would also be very expensive to launch a satellite of its type, when there are others which are able to monitor the area every few days. UAVs can also be used to pick up vital information. Not only that, launching a permanent satellite would help international relations would it.
Log in to comment